+ Site Statistics
PDF Full Text:
+ Resolve Accession
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds

EurekaMag Most Shared ContentMost Shared

EurekaMag PDF Full Text ContentPDF Full Text

+ PDF Full Text

Request PDF Full TextRequest PDF Full Text

Submit PDF Full TextSubmit PDF Full Text

+ Follow Us

Follow on FacebookFollow on Facebook

Follow on TwitterFollow on Twitter

Follow on Google+Follow on Google+

Follow on LinkedInFollow on LinkedIn

Follow on TumblrFollow on Tumblr

+ Translate


Experimental mandibular regrowth by distraction osteogenesis: Long-term results

, : Experimental mandibular regrowth by distraction osteogenesis: Long-term results. Archives of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery 119(5): 511-516

The use of gradual distraction to grow bone (distraction osteogenesis) has gained widespread orthopedic acceptance, but has only recently been applied to craniofacial skeletal defects. The use of bifocal distraction osteogenesis to fill experimental segmental mandibular defects with regenerate bone was recently reported. Though all canines in that study demonstrated normal oromandibular function, they were observed for only 4 weeks following defect closure. The study that is now reported describes the long-term (12-month) functional, morphologic, and biomechanical results when bifocal distraction osteogenesis was applied to the same model. In this long-term study, three canines had 2.5-cm unilateral segmental mandibular body defects filled with structurally stable bone using bifocal distraction osteogenesis. These dogs exhibited normal oromandibular function for 1 year following segment regrowth and external fixator removal. Macroscopic and histologic evaluation of the regrown segments revealed a re-formation of the cortical and medullary architecture. Stress testing demonstrated the average ultimate strength of the regrown segment at 53 MPa, which corresponded to 77% +- 5.7% of normal mandibular bone. The data suggest that clinical trials applying this technique to segmental mandibular reconstruction are warranted.

Accession: 008652878

PDF Full Text: Submit

Submit PDF Full Text

No spam - Every submission is manually reviewed

Select a PDF file:

Close Close

Other references

Wengle H P., 1986, Annals Of Plastic Surgery 16(6): 487-493

Khimani, A. H.; Flurkey, W. H.; Bozarth, R. F., 1996, Phytopathology. 86(11 Suppl.): S100

Mimran, Albert; Ribstein, Jean; Du Cailar, Guilhem; Fesler, Pierre, 2003, American Journal Of Hypertension. 16(5 Part 2): 97a

Anderson, F. M., 1940, Proceedings Sixth Pacific Science Congress Berkeley etc, 1: 393-398

Tahiri A., 1993, International Association of Sedimentologists Regional Meeting 14: 312-313

Fayer, R. Johnson, A. J.; Hildebrandt, P. K., 1976, Journal Parasit, 621: 10-14

Anonymous, 1984, Heredity 52: 5-59

Castren, E.; Thoenen, H.; Lindholm, D., 1995: We have detected scattered brain-derived neurotrophic factor mRNA-producing neurons in the medial septal nucleus, which contains cholinergic neurons that are responsive to brain-derived neurotrophic factor and nerve growth factor. In the brainstem, many adrenergic neurons showed a positive signal for brain-derived neurotrophic factor messenger R...

Kim, D. A.; Kim, J. D.; Lee, K. N.; Shin, D. U.; Chung, J. R.; Kim, W. H., 1997: In a field trial at Seoul National University in 1995-96, maize was grown for silage following Trifolium pratense, T. incarnatum, Medicago sativa or winter fallow, and was given 0 or 90 kg N/ha. Compared with fallow, legumes depleted soil water (0-15 cm soil) at maize sowing by 17-26%. Legume residues also delayed emergence of maize by 8-11 days...

Hayes J.R.; Stevens A.B.; Mckane R.; Bell P.M., 1988, Diabetes Research & Clinical Practice. 5(suppl. 1): S623