EurekaMag.com logo
+ Site Statistics
References:
53,869,633
Abstracts:
29,686,251
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
EurekaMag Most Shared ContentMost Shared
EurekaMag PDF Full Text ContentPDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full TextRequest PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on FacebookFollow on Facebook
Follow on TwitterFollow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedInFollow on LinkedIn

+ Translate

Response of six American sugarbeet varieties to Cercospora beticola infection in Hungary



Response of six American sugarbeet varieties to Cercospora beticola infection in Hungary



Acta Phytopathologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 5(1): 41-46



One hybrid (67MSH473), classed as moderately resistant under conditions in the USA, gave the same response as highly susceptible varieties, suggesting that differences in biotypes exist between the USA and Hungary.

(PDF emailed within 1 workday: $29.90)

Accession: 000485914

Download citation: RISBibTeXText



Related references

Response of 6 american sugar beet d varieties to cercospora beticola infection in hungary. Acta Phytopathologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae: 41-46, 1970

Response of sugarbeet in Europe and the USA to Cercospora beticola infection. Agronomy Journal 77(1): 126-129, 1985

Response of sugarbeet beta vulgaris in europe and the usa to cercospora beticola infection. Agronomy Journal 77(1): 126-129, 1985

Differential response of a sensitive and tolerant sugarbeet line to Cercospora beticola infection and UV-B radiation. Physiologia Plantarum 109(1): 21-27, 2000

Influence of natural conditions on the prevalence of Cercospora leaf spot (Cercospora beticola Sacc.) and Ramularia leaf spot (Ramularia beticola Fant & Lamb.) in different varieties of sugarbeet. Zemes ukio Mokslai (4): 28-35, 2004

Susceptibility of sugarbeet lines and hybrids in artificial and natural Cercospora leaf spot (Cercospora beticola Sacc.) infection. Sjemenarstvo 15(5): 269-281, 1998

Reaction of sugarbeet varieties with different susceptibility to the infestation with Cercospora beticola. Sugar Industry / Zuckerindustrie 132(3): 183-194, 2007

Infection of Cercospora beticola in sugarbeet in relation to susceptibility. Phytopathology, 61: 5, 463-466, 1971

Effect of leaf wetness duration and air temperature on Cercospora beticola infection of Sugarbeet. Phytopathology. 61: 5, 546-549, 1971

Influence of leaf fertilization with nitrogen and magnesium on infection of sugarbeet by Cercospora beticola Sacc. Progress in Plant Protection 45(2): 926-928, 2005

Survival, spore trapping, dispersal, and primary infection site for Cercospora beticola in sugarbeet. Phytopathology 96(6): S140-S140, 2006

The role of potassium in beet cercospora (Cercospora beticola Sacc.) attacks on sugarbeet. Pol' nohospodarstvo 35(7): 615-622, 1989

Tests of benzimidazolic derivatives and other products for the control of sugarbeet cercospora (Cercospora beticola Sacc.). Annali (ser 4) 94 (2) 229-238, 1974

Forecasting models for the prediction of Cercospora leaf spot disease (Cercospora beticola) of sugarbeet. Zbornik predavanj in referatov 6 Slovenskega Posvetovanje o Varstvu Rastlin, Zrece, Slovenije, 4-6 marec 2003 : 199-204, 2003

Infection of sugarbeet stands by the fungus Cercospora beticola Sacc. during study of the proper system of fertilizer application. Sbornik Rada A: Spisy Fakulty agronomicke7(1): 131-142, 1979