EurekaMag.com logo
+ Site Statistics
References:
53,869,633
Abstracts:
29,686,251
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
EurekaMag Most Shared ContentMost Shared
EurekaMag PDF Full Text ContentPDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full TextRequest PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on FacebookFollow on Facebook
Follow on TwitterFollow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedInFollow on LinkedIn

+ Translate

Transplanting versus direct-seeding of processing tomatoes for once-over harvest



Transplanting versus direct-seeding of processing tomatoes for once-over harvest



Arkansas Farm Research 24(5): 11



In a trial with 30 tomato cvs and selections the effects were compared of direct seeding at 2 plant clumps/row ft and transplanting in peat cups, the seeded plants being sprayed with ethephon at 0 or 480 p.p.m. 10 days before harvest. Data are presented on the yields of fruit in various categories and on the average weight, firmness and picking date of canning-ripe fruit. Inter-cv. differences in relation to method of planting were not consistent.

(PDF emailed within 1 workday: $29.90)

Accession: 000563066

Download citation: RISBibTeXText



Related references

Transplanting versus direct seeding of processing tomatoes for once over harvest. Food production management: 99 (1) 18, 1976

Costs for direct seeding and transplanting of tomatoes for processing. HortScience 6(5): 479-480, 1971

Processing tomatoes: planning of sowing, transplanting and time of harvest. Informatore Agrario 40(9): 143-152, 1984

Direct seeding tomatoes for mechanical harvest. Res. Progr. Rep. Purdue Univ. agric. Exp. Stat, 366: 7, 1970

The transition of the California processing industry from direct-seeding to transplanting. Hortscience 41(4): 986-986, 2006

Direct seeding of processing tomatoes. Canada Agric, 15: 2, 26-7, 1970

Direct seeding of tomatoes for processing. 1971

Direct seeding versus transplanting of green and red chile in northern New Mexico. 1992

Direct seeding of dwarf tomatoes for processing has advantages. New Zealand Commercial Grower, 25: 17, 19-21, 1970

An economic analysis of transplanting versus direct seeding of selected medicinal herbs in New Mexico. Journal of Herbs, Spices and Medicinal Plants 7(4): 15-29, 2000

Studies on comparative performance of raising tomato through direct seeding versus transplanting technology. Journal of Research, Punjab Agricultural University 32(2): 151-153, 1995

Transplanting versus direct seeding of bajra (Pennisetum typhoideum) in a semi-reclaimed sodic soil. Current agriculture 4(1-2): 63-65, 1980

Yield, quality, and water use efficiency of muskmelon are affected by irrigation and transplanting versus direct seeding. HortScience: a ication of the American Society for Horticultural Science 36(2): 286-291, 2001

Studies on growing unstaked processing tomatoes. Some experiments on direct seeding. Bull. hort. Res. Stat., Morioka, Ser. C, 3, 73-87. bibl. 12, 1965

Control of Elymus repens and dicot weeds at harvest (combine-spraying) or shortly after harvest. A comparison between direct seeding and conventional seeding. Weeds and weed control, 28th Swedish weed conference, Uppsala 28-29 January 1987 Vol1 Reports: 159-166, 1987