+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Drift of glyphosate sprays applied with aerial and ground equipment



Drift of glyphosate sprays applied with aerial and ground equipment



Weed Science 26(6): 597-604



The potential losses from spray applications of glyphosate with and without the inclusion of a polymer thickening agent were evaluated in field tests, applied under identified weather conditions with a boom-nozzle ground sprayer, helicopter and fixed-wing aircraft. The downwind transport and diffusion of the spray loss was assessed by means of Mylar fall-out sheets, high vol. air samplers and 4-leaf wheat 'Anza' plants.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 1 workday: $29.90)

Accession: 000634498

Download citation: RISBibTeXText


Related references

Differences in penetration and efficacy of insecticide sprays applied by aerial and ground equipment to soybean glycine max. Journal of Entomological Science 20(1): 34-41, 1985

Downwind drift and droplet distribution of naled aerial sprays applied for stable fly control over Gulf beaches. Journal of the Florida Anti Mosquito Association 56(2): 86-90, 1985

Low-volume concentrated sprays applied by ground equipment for control of the boll weevil. J Econ Entomol 59(1): 114-116, 1966

Biological responses to glyphosate drift from aerial application in non-glyphosate-resistant corn. Pest Management Science 66(10): 1148-1154, 2010

Field tests of insecticides applied as ultra low volume sprays by ground equipment for the control of adult mosquitoes. Mosquito News 41(1): 132-135, 1981

Chemical control of bacterial blights of dry field beans in Michigan by foliage sprays applied by ground and air equipment. Plant Dis Report 51(8): 622-625, 1967

Effects of Soybean Row Spacing on Spray Penetration and Efficacy of Insecticides Applied with Aerial and Ground Equipment. Environmental Entomology 13(4): 948-953, 1984

Procedures and problems involved in assessing the droplet size of insecticides applied by aerial and ground ULV equipment. Proceedings, New Jersey Mosquito Control Association, Inc? recd 1977; 62: 217-219, 1975

The deposit of technical malathion applied ultra low volume in various droplet sizes by ground equipment and the effect of drift on its distribution. 1971

Effects of soybean glycine max row spacing on spray penetration and efficacy of insecticides applied with aerial and ground equipment. Environmental Entomology 13(4): 948-953, 1984

Deposits of monocrotophos from low-volume and ultra-low-volume sprays applied aerially or from ground equipment. J. econ. Ent, 64: 1, 200-204, 1971

Aerial spray drift from different formulations of glyphosate. Transactions of the ASAE 43(3): 555-559, 2000

Aerial drift profile of oil and water sprays Pesticides. Proceedings of the Beltwide Cotton Production Mechanization Conference: 3-45, 1983

Modeling Glyphosate aerial spray drift at the EcuadorColombia border. Applied Mathematical Modelling 40(1): 373-387, 2016

Evaluation of the deposit and drift of glyphosate in aerial sprayings in 1987. Evaluation du depot et de la derive du glyphosate lors de pulverisations aeriennes en 1987: 53 pp., 1988