+ Site Statistics
References:
52,654,530
Abstracts:
29,560,856
PMIDs:
28,072,755
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn

+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

3. Agricultural policies in mainland Tanzania, 1946-76



3. Agricultural policies in mainland Tanzania, 1946-76



Rural development in tropical Africa: 52-89



The paper first discusses the three main agricultural policies attempted in Tanganika in the post-war years: (1) the encouragement of white settlers; (2) the Groundnut Scheme, in which European expertise was to be applied not in the private sector but on the very large government-run state farms; (3) land development and soil conservation schemes under which the mass of the African population was compelled, by the threat of fines or imprisonment, to carry out agricultural practice supposed to be to their good. By 1956 mass compulsion was no longer possible, and a change of policy was initiated; concentration on small selected points, a procedure known as the "focal point approach". At the same time as it followed the focal point approach in its extension work, the government encouraged development of a co-operative movement to take over the marketing of peasant-grown crops from Asian and African traders. In the early 1960s when the inefficiency and corruption of the co-operatives became obvious, they became the first nationalist institutions to be attacked by the peasants. The second half of the paper discusses the post-independence agricultural policies of ujamaa and villagization. It is concluded that ever since the government started intervening directly in agricultural production, in the Groundnuts Scheme, it has made technical mistakes which have led to failures and waste of resources. The cost is not only financial. The social cost is an unco-operative peasantry. Before colonial times they devised agricultural systems (in Ukara Island, in the Rufiji, the irrigation systems on Kilimanjaro, and many others) that were agriculturally rational uses of nature's raw materials. In the 20 years of the focal point approach they demonstrated that in certain conditions they could innovate and increase production. The motivation then was the possibility of getting rich. It seems very unlikely that Tanzania's problems of agricultural production will go away while bureaucrats think that they understand what peasant farmers ought to do and see the solution to those problems in terms of forcing the peasants to work.

(PDF emailed within 1 workday: $29.90)

Accession: 000803669

Download citation: RISBibTeXText



Related references

Agricultural policies in mainland Tanzania. Review of African Political Economy (10): 74-100, 1978

Agricultural sample survey of Tanzania mainland. 1986

Consumption effects of agricultural policies in Tanzania. AID Research and Development Abstracts 11(3/4): p.41, 1984

Government policies and agricultural performance: Tanzania and Kenya. Economic reform, trade and agricultural development: 19-47, 1993

Economic policies and agricultural performance. The case of Tanzania. Economic policies and agricultural performance The case of Tanzania: 122, 1986

The utility of compulsion in the implementation of agricultural policies: a case study from Tanzania. Canadian Journal of African Studies 7(2): 305-316, 1973

The introduction of agricultural innovations through cooperative farming: a brief outline of Tanzania's policies. East African Journal of Rural Development. Nairobi, 3: 1, 1-15, 1970

Report of the Chief of the Bureau of Plant Industry, Soils and Agricultural Engineering, Agricultural Research Administration 1946. Beltsville, Maryland, 1946. Report of the Chief of the Bureau of Plant Industry, Soils and Agricultural Engineering, Agricultural Research Administration Beltsville, Maryland, 1946, 1946. 64, 1946

The role of government policies in agricultural development: the case of the cattle industry in Tanzania. Quarterly Journal of International Agriculture 21(1): 52-61, 1982

Agricultural development policies and institutional support systems in post-colonial Kenya and Tanzania. Journal of Eastern African research and development0(20): 104-126, 1990

Of large-scale and small farms: a comparative paradigmatic inquiry into the agricultural policies of Zimbabwe, Malawi and Tanzania. African perspectives on development: controversies, dilemmas and openings: 96-106, 1994

Goal placement and goal attainment of agricultural price policies in Tanzania represented for example by oil fruit. 1984

Are agricultural policies making us fat? Likely links between agricultural policies and human nutrition and obesity, and their policy implications. Review of Agricultural Economics Boston 28(3): 313-322, 2006

Trends in agricultural policies since 1955. Fifth report on agricultural policies in Europe and North America. Trends in agricultural policies since Fifth report on agricultural policies in Europe and North America, Paris: OEEC, 360. Price: $ 3.50,, 1961

Report on the working during October 1938 to September 1946 and the agricultural year 1946-47. Report on the working during October to September 1946 and the agricultural year 1946-47, Malta: Govt. Printing Office., 145, 1949