EurekaMag.com logo
+ Site Statistics
References:
53,869,633
Abstracts:
29,686,251
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
EurekaMag Most Shared ContentMost Shared
EurekaMag PDF Full Text ContentPDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full TextRequest PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on FacebookFollow on Facebook
Follow on TwitterFollow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedInFollow on LinkedIn

+ Translate

Comparison of results of the automated complement fixation screening tests with conventional serologic tests in two dairy herds - one with recent and one with chronic brucellosis



Comparison of results of the automated complement fixation screening tests with conventional serologic tests in two dairy herds - one with recent and one with chronic brucellosis



Proceedings of the United States Animal Health Association 84: 128-135



Two calfhood vaccinated dairy herds each of about 2000 cows were studied. Herd A had been free from brucellosis until recently. Herd B was chronically infected and had been under quarantine for many years. Serum samples from both herds were tested both by routine screening methods (standard plate agglutination, card and rivanol tests), and also by automated complement fixation screening test (ACFST). Most reactors were detected by ACFST 3-10 weeks earlier than by conventional tests.

(PDF emailed within 1 workday: $29.90)

Accession: 000844184

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 6947284



Related references

Comparison among complement fixation, indirect ELISA and competitive ELISA tests in the serodiagnosis of brucellosis in cattle from herds with a history of the disease. Ars Veterinaria 11(1): 47-55, 1995

Comparison of the sensitivity of complement fixation tests, virus neutralization tests and the indirect immunofluorescence methods in the serologic diagnosis of tick-borne encephalitis. Ceskoslovenska Epidemiologie, Mikrobiologie, Imunologie 18(4): 193-198, 1969

A Comparison of Tissue and Spirochaetal Antigens in Complement Fixation Tests for Syphilis Based Upon the Results Observed in the Washington Serologic Survey. American Journal of Clinical Pathology 12(9): 480-487, 1942

Comparison of serologic tests and bacteriologic culture for detection of brucellosis in swine from naturally infected herds. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 207(10): 1332-1333, 1995

Comparison of serologic screening tests for brucellosis. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 25(10): 1969-1972, 1987

Studies on the serologic identification of adenovirus. I. Comparison of the hemagglutination, conglutinating complement adsorption, and complement fixation tests. Journal of Laboratory and Clinical Medicine 51(3): 495-500, 1958

Results of agglutination and complement fixation tests in brucellosis. Przeglad Epidemiologiczny 26(2): 213-220, 1972

Results of the agglutination and complement fixation tests in brucellosis. 1985

Rapid screening tests for the diagnosis of bovine brucellosis by the complement fixation test. Australian Veterinary Journal 50(3): 108-110, 1974

Comparison of the rose bengal and complement fixation tests (for brucellosis in cattle). Repositorio de Trabalhos do Laboratorio Nacional de Investigacao Veterinaria 10: 43,45-47, 1978

A comparison of the tube agglutination, supplemental, and brucellosis ring tests in selected dairy herds in NewYork. Cornell Vet, 59: 349-354, 1969

A comparison of the toxoplasmin skin tests, the Sabin-Feldman dye tests, and the complement fixation tests for toxoplasmosis in various forms of uveitis. Bulletin of the Johns Hopkins Hospital 99(1): 1-15, 1956

Comparison of the slow and the ordinary complement fixation tests in bovine vibriosis and brucellosis.. Sborn. Trud. Leningrad, nauchno-issled. vet. Inst, 9: 43-50, 1961

Comparison of the Meinieke Floeculation, Agglutination, and Complement-Fixation Tests for Bovine Brucellosis. Beretn. 5 nord. Vet. m<o>de Kbh. 1940. 297-820, 1940

Problems of diagnosing swine brucellosis: a comparison of the agglutination and complement fixation tests. Trudy Gosudarstvennogo Nauchno Kontrol' nogo Instituta Veterinarnykh Preparatov 20: 151-155, 1974