+ Site Statistics
References:
54,258,434
Abstracts:
29,560,870
PMIDs:
28,072,757
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Variations in unit hydrographs on a very small agricultural catchment



Variations in unit hydrographs on a very small agricultural catchment



Australian Journal of Soil Research 19(2): 121-132



Unit hydrographs (5 min 1 mm) were derived from 6 storms in the period Nov. 1976 to March 1979 on a 1.2 ha catchment at Greenmount, about 25 km south of Toowoomba in southeast Queensland [Australia]. Peak rates of runoff in the 6 storms ranged from 1.12-50.13 mm/h. All unit hydrographs were derived from multiperiod storms using an iterative procedure. Considerable variation occurred among the unit hydrographs with peak ordinate values ranging from 2.18-9.45 mm/h. Each unit hydrograph could be separated into 2 components, surface runoff and interflow. The proportion of surface runoff in the unit hydrograph increased as the intensity of rainfall excess increased, and ranged from 5% in the storm with peak runoff of 1.12 mm/h to 86% in the storm with peak runoff of 50.13 mm/h. A large amount of runoff from the catchment occurred as interflow, consisting of water moving downslope through the porous cultivated surface layers of soil. The traditional separation of interflow from surface runoff prior to derivation of the unit hydrograph could not be done because of the complexity of the storm patterns. It is possible to derive unit hydrographs which include an interflow component and to separate surface runoff and interflow in the unit hydrograph itself. A simple model was developed in which the proportions of surface runoff and interflow were allowed to vary from storm to storm. The proportions were adjusted by trial and error to match estimated runoff with actual runoff. The simple model reproduced observed runoff hydrographs with only minor errors of fit. The surface runoff component of the simple model behaved in accordance with traditional linear unit hydrograph theory. Variations in the unit hydrographs were accounted for by variations in the proportions of surface runoff and interflow from storm to storm.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 001030784

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

DOI: 10.1071/SR9810121


Related references

Derivation of unit by hydrographs for hilly watersheds of lower Bhavani catchment. Karnataka Journal of Agricultural Sciences 13(2): 493-495, 2000

An instantaneous unit sediment graph study of a small agricultural catchment in Kenya, East Africa. Pages 603-608 1998, 1998

Effects of forest and agricultural land use on flood unit hydrographs. Hydrology papers: 977, 92, 1977

Incremental distributed modelling investigation in a small agricultural catchment: 1. Overland flow with comparison with the unit hydrograph model. Hydrological Processes 21(1): 80-91, 2007

Deriving unit hydrographs for small catchments. Water and Environmental Management 17(4): 245-250, 2003

Spatial and temporal variations in non-point source losses of nitrogen and phosphorus in a small agricultural catchment in the Three Gorges Region. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 188(4): 257-257, 2016

Determining design unit hydrographs for small watersheds. Water-Resources Investigations - U S, 1993

Development of synthetic unit hydrographs for small watersheds in the aravalli hill range of rajasthan india. Mohan Raj, D R (Ed ) Small Watershed Hydrology; Workshop on The Role Of Small Watershed Hydrology in Rainfed Agriculture, November 22-24, 1988 Iv+40p International Crops Research Institute For The Semi-Arid Tropics: Patancheru, Andhra Pradesh, India Illus Paper 32-33, 1989

Hydrological relations of small lowland catchments: the forested catchment of the river Jalowka and the agricultural catchment of the river Kamionka. Prace Inst. Bad. Lesn, 341, 227-305, 1968

Clark's and Espey's unit hydrographs vs the gamma unit hydrograph. Hydrological Sciences Journal 50(6): 1053-1067, 2005

Model for computation of discharge hydrographs from a snow-covered catchment. Zeitschrift fur Kulturtechnik und Flurbereinigung 19(4): 210-216, 1978

On the ability to infer spatial catchment variability using streamflow hydrographs. Water Resources Research 47.8, 2011

Genetically modified hydrographs: what can grass genetics do for temperate catchment hydrology?. Hydrological Processes 21(16): 2217-2221, 2007

Solute variations in small catchment streams. Transactions, Institute of British Geographers New Series, 1973

Changes in water yield and storm hydrographs following commercial clearcutting on a southern Appalachian catchment. Proceedings of the International Symposium: Hydrological research basins and their use in water resources planning Bern, Switzerland, Sept 21-23, 1982: 583-594, 1982