EurekaMag.com logo
+ Site Statistics
References:
53,623,987
Abstracts:
29,492,080
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
EurekaMag Most Shared ContentMost Shared
EurekaMag PDF Full Text ContentPDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full TextRequest PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on FacebookFollow on Facebook
Follow on TwitterFollow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedInFollow on LinkedIn

+ Translate

A greater potential for low-quality conserved forage



A greater potential for low-quality conserved forage



Fifty fifth Annual Report, 1981-1982, of The Agricultural Research Institute of Northern Ireland: 13-22



Conserved forage production in Northern Ireland in 1980 comprised grass silage (960 X 103 t DM), grass hay (463 X 103 t DM) and cereal straw (103 X 103 t DM). Gross energy contents were similar and within the range 17.6-18.4 MJ/kg, while metabolizable energy contents were more varied due to differences in digestibility.

(PDF 0-2 workdays service: $29.90)

Accession: 001038092

Download citation: RISBibTeXText



Related references

Forage quality and yield of limpograss as a conserved forage for winter grazing. Agronomy Abstracts: 119, 1977

The potential of conserved forage for beef production. Forage conservation in the 80' s Occasional Symposium No 11 [Thomas, C Editor]: 144-153, 1980

The potential of conserved forage for milk production. Forage conservation in the 80' s Occasional Symposium No 11 [Thomas, C Editor]: 154-163, 1980

Quality of forage conserved using a variety of methods. Revue Suisse d' Agriculture 31(6): 285-289, 1999

Forage production and quality evaluation of four sorghum forage hybrids. Yield potential. Revista de la Facultad de Agronomia, Universidad del Zulia 17(5): 413-423, 2000

Illinois Bundleflower Forage Potential in the Upper Midwestern USA: II. Forage Quality. Agronomy Journal 97(3): 5-903, 2005

Yield potential and forage quality of annual forage legumes in southern Alberta and northeast Saskatchewan. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 84(1): 143-155, 2004

Preharvest factors influencing quality of conserved forage. Journal of Animal Science 47(3): 712-720, 1978

Conserved forage - optimal quality for milk production. Conserved forage optimal quality for milk production: 31, 1976

Characterization of conserved forage quality and strategy for its effective utilization for milk production. Animal Production 30(3): 474-475, 1980

Determination of nutritional quality of soyabean (Glycine max. L. Merr.) forage which had been conserved during ensiling and haymaking. Acta Agronomica, Universidad Nacional de Colombia 37(1): 66-79, 1987

A T greater than C transition causing a Leu greater than Pro substitution in a conserved region of the arylsulfatase A gene in a late infantile metachromatic leukodystrophy patient. Clinical Genetics 52(1): 65-67, 1997

Analysis of forage yield and quality potential of small grain crops and the interrelationships among biological, chemical, morphological, and anatomical determinants of quality. Dissertation Abstracts International, B 41(11): 3969, 1981

Nutritive quality of forage plants for greater snow goose goslings: when is it advantageous to feed on grazed plants?. Canadian Journal of Zoology. December; 7712: 1908-1918, 1999

Potential bee forage at the Agriculture Canada Morden Research Station. Part I: Two experimental essential oil crops that might also have the potential for supplying exceptional bee forage. American Bee Journal 134(1): 31-33, 1994