+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Control of flowering of orchard grass (Dactylis glomerata L.) IX. Influence of low temperature immediately after floral induction treatment on heading behaviour



Control of flowering of orchard grass (Dactylis glomerata L.) IX. Influence of low temperature immediately after floral induction treatment on heading behaviour



Journal of Japanese Society of Grassland Science 28(4): 420-425



Cocksfoot Nakei EV-No.1, Aonami and Later were subjected to floral-induction treatment of a 9 h photoperiod and low temp. for different durations in autumn. After treatments, their heading responses were observed under continuous light at (a) high temp. for 35 days or at (b) low temp. (10 deg C) for 7 days then high temp. for 28 days.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 1 workday: $29.90)

Accession: 001058340

Download citation: RISBibTeXText


Related references

Control of flowering of orchard grass dactylis glomerata 7. influence of low temperature immediately after floral induction treatment on heading behavior. Grassland Science 28(4): 420-425, 1983

Control of flowering of orchard grass dactylis glomerata 6. influence of temperature and day length on floral induction in aged plants. Grassland Science 28(2): 182-187, 1982

Control of flowering of orchard grass dactylis glomerata 3. influence of fertilizer application on responsiveness to floral induction treatment in aged plants. Sochi Shikenjo Kenkyu Hokoku (17): 67-75, 1980

Control of flowering of orchard grass dactylis glomerata 7. reversal of floral induction by high temperature. Grassland Science 28(3): 265-271, 1982

Control of flowering of orchard grass dactylis glomerata 4. acquirement of responsiveness to floral induction treatment in seedlings. Grassland Science 27(2): 139-146, 1981

Control of flowering of orchard grass dactylis glomerata 2. influence of day length on floral induction inflorescence differentiation and its development in seedling. Sochi Shikenjo Kenkyu Hokoku (16): 47-55, 1980

Control of flowering of orchard grass dactylis glomerata 8. interaction of day length and temperature for flora induction and inflorescence differentiation in dactylis glomerata ssp judaica. Grassland Science 28(4): 413-419, 1983

Control of flowering of orchard grass dactylis glomerata 5. increase in responsiveness to floral induction treatment with plant age after juvenile stage. Grassland Science 27(2): 147-151, 1981

Control of flowering of orchard grass dactylis glomerata 10. influence of flower induction of the main stem on heading behavior of lateral tiller buds and its difference among genotypes. Grassland Science 29(1): 9-16, 1983

Control of flowering of cocksfoot (Dactylis glomerata L.). X. Influence of floral induction of main stem on heading behaviour of lateral tiller buds and its difference among genotypes. Journal of Japanese Society of Grassland Science 29(1): 9-16, 1983

Control of flowering of orhard grass (Dactylis glomerata L.) VIII. Interaction of daylength and temperature for floral induction and inflorescence differentiation in D. glomerata subsp. judaica. Journal of Japanese Society of Grassland Science 28(4): 413-419, 1983

Control of flowering of orchard grass dactylis glomerata 1. optimum temperature for flora induction in seedling. Sochi Shikenjo Kenkyu Hokoku (15): 49-58, 1979

Floral induction and forage yield and quality of sparse flowering orchard grass dactylis glomerata synthetics. Crop Science 21(5): 677-680, 1981

Control of flowering in cocksfoot (Dactylis glomerata L.). VI. Influence of temperature and day length on floral induction in aged plant. Journal of Japanese Society of Grassland Science 28(2): 182-187, 1982

Control of flowering in cocksfoot (Dactylis glomerata L.) 3. Influence of fertilizer application on response to floral induction treatment in the aged plant. Bulletin of the National Grassland Research Institute (17): 68-75, 1980