+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Growth of sugarbeet in competition with Amaranthus retroflexus L. and Chenopodium album L



Growth of sugarbeet in competition with Amaranthus retroflexus L. and Chenopodium album L



Novenytermeles 31(5): 395-403



In sugarbeet infested with A. retroflexus or C. album, weeds reduced root wt. but not root sugar content. Weed infestation reduced LAI, CGR, NAR, leaf area ratio, specific leaf area and relative leaf growth rate. LAI was greater in A. retroflexus than in C. album.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 1 workday: $29.90)

Accession: 001083658

Download citation: RISBibTeXText


Related references

The competition index of Chenopodium album L. and Amaranthus retroflexus L. in sugarbeet. Nvenyvedelem 19(6): 273, 1983

Effect of various applications of nitrogen on competition between sugarbeet, Amaranthus retroflexus L. and Chenopodium album L. Ossezlfoglalok CIEC, Tragyazasi Vilagkongresszusa 9: 30, 1984

Growth analysis of Amaranthus retroflexus L. and Chenopodium album L. in and without the presence of sugarbeet as a competitor plant. VIIIe Colloque International sur la Biologie, l' Ecologie et la Systematique des Mauvaises Herbes (Vol. 2): 619-629, 1988

Competitive ability of Amaranthus retroflexus and Chenopodium album in competition with three sugar beet cultivars under water stress. Aspects of Applied Biology ( 52): 153-158, 1998

Common lambsquarter (Chenopodium album L.) and redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus L.) competition in snapbeans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Abstracts, 1983 Meeting of the Weed Science Society of America: 32-33, 1983

Ecophysiology of corn (Zea mays L.) competition with redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus L.) and common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album L.) in low and high input conditions. Agricultural Sciences and Technology 19(1): Pe137-Pe146, 2005

Allelopathic effects of Chenopodium album, Amaranthus retroflexus and Cynodon dactylon on germination and growth of safflower. Journal of Food Agriculture and Environment 7(2): 516-521, 2009

Weeding of the beet d abstract chenopodium glaucum d chenopodium album d amaranthus retroflexus d pyrazon herbic. Recherches Agronomiques 12: 30, 1968

Metribuzin resistance in Amaranthus retroflexus and Chenopodium album in Greece. Weed Science 48(1): 69-74, 2000

The Nitrogen Use Efficiency of C(3) and C(4) Plants: I. Leaf Nitrogen, Growth, and Biomass Partitioning in Chenopodium album (L.) and Amaranthus retroflexus (L.). Plant Physiology 84(3): 954-958, 1987

Critical density of Amaranthus retroflexus L. and Chenopodium album L. in sugar beet. Novenytermeles 33(2): 139-145, 1984

Data concerning damage caused by Amaranthus retroflexus L. and Chenopodium album L. in maize stands. Novenyvedelem 19(6): 273, 1983

Effect of 2 4 d herbic on the structure of some plants yeast amaranthus retroflexus d chenopodium album d. Botanicheskii Zhurnal (St Petersburg) 53(3): 377-378, 1968

Alterations in amount of chlorophyll as indicator of resistance for Chenopodium album L. and Amaranthus retroflexus L. to atrazine. Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection (Sp. Iss. 20): 131-138, 2006

Variability in reaction to different herbicide dosages and resistance within species of Chenopodium album L. and Amaranthus retroflexus L. Nachrichtenblatt des Deutschen Pflanzenschutzdienstes 59(7): 149-154, 2007