+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Impacts of fuel costs, distance-to-market, and equipment utilization on relative costs of trailer-on-flatcar and truck transportation for fresh fruits and vegetables in the South



Impacts of fuel costs, distance-to-market, and equipment utilization on relative costs of trailer-on-flatcar and truck transportation for fresh fruits and vegetables in the South



Southern journal of agricultural economics Southern Agricultural Economics Association 14(2): 111-117



The use of trailers-on-flatcars (TOFC) to transport fresh fruits and vegetables in the South is examined. A costing model is employed to examine the effects of equipment utilization rates, distance-to-market, and fuel costs on the relative per revenue mile costs of trucks and TOFC. The results suggest that while fuel costs and distance-to-market are important, the level of equipment utilization, in particular the percentage of loaded backhauls, has the greatest impact in determining the least cost mode.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 1 workday: $29.90)

Accession: 001087289

Download citation: RISBibTeXText


Related references

Trailer-on-flatcar transportation of fresh fruits and vegetables: the Southwest and Florida. Staff paper University of Florida Food and Resource Economics Department: 981 (183), 1981

Truck transportation of fresh fruits and vegetables: an econometric analysis of the Southwest region's fresh produce truck service market. Dissertation Abstracts International A, Humanities and Social Sciences 49(6): p.1595, 1988

Transportation and handling costs of selected fresh fruits and vegetables in the San Francisco Bay terminal market area. Market. Res. Rep., U.S. Dep. Agric. Bur. agric. Econ, 2: 65. Price: 35 cents,, 1952

Shifts in rail and truck transportation of fresh fruits and vegetables. Mktg Res. Rep. U.S. Dep. Agric, 237: 52. Price: 35 cents,, 1958

Energy conservation in agricultural transportation Distribution costs, truck fuel consumption, management. L Cooperative Extension Service Kansas State University: 82 (576), 1982

Radiation-pasteurizing fresh strawberries and other fresh fruits and vegetables: estimates of costs and benefits. [Bull.] Econ. Res. Serv., US Dep. Agric, USDA,Washington, D.C, 1965

Aspects of distribution costs for fresh vegetables and fruits. 1975

The effects of rising energy costs and transportation mode mix on forest fuel procurement costs. Biomass and Bioenergy 35(1): 690-699, 2011

Owner-operator costs of hauling fresh fruits and vegetables in refrigerated trucks. ESCS United States Dept of Agriculture Economics Statistics and Cooperatives Service: 980 (82), 1980

Costs and returns for selected fresh market vegetables in Oklahoma for small scale producers. Research report P Oklahoma Agricultural Experiment Station: 86 (875), 1986

Transport costs impacts on the fresh market for peaches--with special emphasis on the Northeast. Northeastern journal of agricultural and resource economics 14(2): 161-168, 1985

Capacity utilization concepts and their relevance to costs and returns of fruits and vegetables' cold stores. Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics 36(2): 59-69, 1981

A contribution to the calculation of costs of tractor utilization--empirical determination of repair and fuel costs. 1976

The effect of relative thinking on firm strategy and market outcomes: A location differentiation model with endogenous transportation costs. Journal of Economic Psychology 29(5): 684-697, 2008

Costs of transporting and exporting agricultural products. Report on transport costs for French and Italian wines, fruit and vegetables in the Common Market framework in 1970. Cout de transport et exportation des produits agricoles Rapport sur les couts de transport des vins, fruits et legumes francais et italiens dans le cadre du Marche Commun en 1970: 101, 1971