EurekaMag.com logo
+ Site Statistics
References:
53,623,987
Abstracts:
29,492,080
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
EurekaMag Most Shared ContentMost Shared
EurekaMag PDF Full Text ContentPDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full TextRequest PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on FacebookFollow on Facebook
Follow on TwitterFollow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedInFollow on LinkedIn

+ Translate

The influence of feeding level and type of feed on the carcasses of steers



The influence of feeding level and type of feed on the carcasses of steers



Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 33(4): 721-730



In an experiment started in June, 1976, 14-16-mo.-old Hereford steers weighing 300 kg were allocated to 5 treatments. Cattle in 4 of the treatment groups, i.e., high (H), medium (M), low (L) and low-high (L-H) growth rates were held in feedlots and offered whole oats supplemented with linseed meal, hay and minerals to obtain growth rates of 1.0, 0.7, 0.4 and 0.4-1.0 kg day-1, respectively. Steers in the 5th treatment group were grazed on pasture (P) to gain weight at 0.7 kg day-1 and received no supplements. Each treatment group of 10 steers was slaughtered at a mean liveweight of 450 kg. The carcasses of H steers were shorter, had more total fat and a greater depth of fat at the 12-13th rib than those of the L steers (fat depths of H, M and L groups were 10.1, 8.6 and 7.1 mm). The H steers also had a larger eye muscle area, a higher ABCAS (Australian Beef Carcase Appraisal System) score and higher carcass grades than the L steers. The L-H treatment was confounded with differences in carcass gain and carcass weight. Pasture grazing reduced carcass fat content as compared with grain feeding (15.2 vs. 18.6%; P < 0.05), but differences in depth and weight of subcutaneous fat in the carcass side or in individual cuts were not significant. There was no detectable difference in tenderness due to level of feeding or feed type. Separately, the effects of feeding level and grain feeding increased carcass fatness by 16 and 22%, respectively; these effects are of commercial importance, particularly if the combined effects are additive.

(PDF emailed within 1 workday: $29.90)

Accession: 001138999

Download citation: RISBibTeXText



Related references

The influence of feeding level and type of feed on the carcasses of steers Hereford breed, liveweight gains. Australian journal of agricultural research3(4): 721-729, 1982

Influence of level and type of dietary protein, and of level of feeding on feed utilization by rainbow trout. Journal of Nutrition 106(11): 1547-1556, 1976

The effect of feeding level and type of rations on the performance of growing and fattening steers using hay and cereal grains 1. feed metabolizability gain production efficiency and dressing percentage. Ain Shams University Faculty of Agriculture Research Bulletin (1352): 1-20, 1980

Identification of factors associated with variability in tenderness among beef carcasses from steers differing in breed body type and days on feed. Journal of Animal Science 51(SUPPL 1): 170, 1980

Influence of feed intake fluctuation, feeding frequency, time of feeding, and rate of gain on performance by limit-fed steers. Professional animal scientist 16(1): 13-20, 2000

The effect of feed restriction on feed efficiencies and carcasses of charolais x hereford steers/. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 64(1): 59-66, 1984

Effects of feed intake level and feeding frequency on feedlot performance and carcass quality of yearling steers. Journal of Animal Science 69(SUPPL 1): 476-477, 1991

The effect of rhythmic changes in the feeding level on the feed utilization and intramuscular fat of young bulls and steers of the milking breeds. Proc. S. Afr. Soc. Anim, Prod., 1967. 6: 105-107, 1967

Influence of feed intake fluctuation and frequency of feeding on performance in limit-fed steers. Journal of Animal Science 75(SUPPL 1): 119, 1997

Effects of limit feeding and ration energy level on feed intake, efficiency and carcass traits in feedlot steers. Journal of Animal Science 71(SUPPL 1): 259, 1993

Influence of level of feed intake and roughage on small intestinal digestion and passage in steers. Animal Science Research Report, Oklahoma Agricultural Experiment Station (MP-118): 161-165, 1986

Influence of level of feed intake on nitrogen metabolism in steers fed high concentrate rations. Journal of Animal Science 53(SUPPL 1): 448-449, 1981

Influence of feed intake level on site of digestion in steers fed a high concentrate diet. Journal of Animal Science 56(2): 471-475, 1983

Influence of feed intake fluctuation and frequency of feeding on rate of passage and total tract digestibility in limit-fed steers. Journal of Dairy Science 81(SUPPL 1): 330, 1998