+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
EurekaMag Most Shared ContentMost Shared
EurekaMag PDF Full Text ContentPDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full TextRequest PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on FacebookFollow on Facebook
Follow on TwitterFollow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedInFollow on LinkedIn

+ Translate

A comparison of the effects of furrow, sprinkler and drip irrigation methods on early strawberries under Cukurova conditions

A comparison of the effects of furrow, sprinkler and drip irrigation methods on early strawberries under Cukurova conditions

Doga Bilim Dergisi, D2 Tarm ve Ormanclk 8(1): 48-56

In studies on the cultivars Pocahontas and Aliso, yields were highest with drip irrigation and lowest with furrow irrigation. On average, the amount of water used for drip irrigation was 38% less than that used in furrows and 20% less than that used by sprinklers.

(PDF emailed within 1 workday: $29.90)

Accession: 001152892

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

Related references

A comparison of furrow, sprinkler and drip irrigation for citrus under Cukurova conditions. Doga Bilim Dergisi, D Veterinerlik Hayvancilik ve Tarim Ormancilik 6(3): 91-98, 1982

Efficient water use of cotton-comparison of furrow and sprinkler irrigation methods under Cukurova conditions. Volume III Water resources and irrigation water management Water management, salinity and pollution control towards sustainable irrigation in the Mediterranean Region CIHEAM International Conference, Valenzano, Bari, Italy, 22-26 September 1997: 119-132, 1997

Comparison between sprinkler, drip and furrow irrigation methods for peach. Italia Agricola 112(9): 113-123, 1975

A comparison of onion production under sprinkler, subsurface drip, and furrow irrigation. Hortscience 30(4): 839, 1995

Evaluation of potato based cropping sequences under drip, sprinkler and furrow methods of irrigation. Potato Journal 32(3/4): 175-176, 2005

Fertilizer management in potato-bottle gourd-urd system under drip, sprinkler and furrow methods of irrigation. Potato, global research and development Proceedings of the Global Conference on Potato, New Delhi, India, 6-11 December, 1999: Volume 2: 912-914, 2002

A comparison between drip, sprinkler and furrow irrigation systems on plant growth and salt distribution. Egyptian Journal of Soil Science 19(1): 31-39, 1979

Water need and nutrient movement in potato based cropping systems under drip, sprinkler and furrow methods of irrigation. 2012

Analysis, estimation of water and energy saving irrigation systems (sprinkler, mobile nozzle, drip, mobile drip and furrow irrigation). International congress on mechanization and energy in agriculture: 307-316, 1993

The effects of drip and sprinkler irrigation methods on weed density and yield in sesame plantation in Sanlurfa conditions (GAP). Ziraat Fakultesi Dergisi, Ataturk Universitesi 33(2): 189-191, 2002

Comparisons of drip, furrow, and sprinkler irrigation. Soil Science 115(1): 73-86, 1973

Furrow, sprinkler, and drip irrigation efficiencies in corn. ASAE Paper (79-2111): 2 pp, 1979

Plant water relations in grapevines under different irrigation levels using drip sprinkler and furrow irrigation ii effect on vegetative growth and production. 1986

Comparison of sprinkler trickle subsurface and furrow irrigation methods for row crops. Agronomy Journal 72(5): 701-704, 1980

Comparison of yields and quality of tomato under two irrigation methods (drip and furrow). Journal of Science and Technology of Agriculture and Natural Resources 4(4): 1-9, 2001