EurekaMag.com logo
+ Site Statistics
References:
53,517,315
Abstracts:
29,339,501
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
EurekaMag Most Shared ContentMost Shared
EurekaMag PDF Full Text ContentPDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full TextRequest PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on FacebookFollow on Facebook
Follow on TwitterFollow on Twitter
Follow on Google+Follow on Google+
Follow on LinkedInFollow on LinkedIn

+ Translate

Effect of body size and cage profile on the shear strength of bones of caged layers



Effect of body size and cage profile on the shear strength of bones of caged layers



British Poultry Science 26(4): 543-548



1. The effects of body size and cage profile on the shear strength of bones from caged layers aged 72 weeks were studied. 2. Bones tested included the radius, ulna, humerus, femur, and tibiotarsus. 3. The ultimate shear force of the femur, tibia, and humerus all increased as body size increased (P < 0.01). 4. The wing bones of birds housed in high profile cages had higher shear breaking loads than birds housed in low profile cages. 5. The ultimate shear stresses of the bones were not affected by body size or cage profile. 6. The radius had the highest shear stress (29.2 MPa), followed in descending order by the ulna (19.1 MPa), tibiotarsus, humerus (11.4 MPa) and femur (11.3 MPa).

(PDF same-day service: $19.90)

Accession: 001342756

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 4075197

DOI: 10.1080/00071668508416846



Related references

Effect of cage and colony size on feather loss in caged layers. British Poultry Science 35(1): 176, 1994

Density and breaking strength of bones of mortalities among caged layers. Research in Veterinary Science 60(2): 185-186, 1996

Effect of body size and ration on performance of caged layers. Poultry Science 48(5): 1829, 1969

The interrelationship between genotype cage size stocking density stress and performance of caged layers. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 68(4): 1321, 1988

Effect of crowding and cage shape on productivity and profitability of caged layers a survey. Poultry Science 64(2): 238-242, 1985

Effect of number and location of nipple waterers and cage shape on the performance of caged layers. Poultry Science 69(12): 2086-2091, 1990

Studies on the housing density of the fowl i effect of cage size and number of layers in cage to performance of the layer. Japanese Poultry Science 5(4): 185-189, 1968

The effect of sodium fluoride on egg production, egg quality, and bone strength of caged layers. Poultry Science 60(4): 771-776, 1981

Effect of dietary changes upon bone strength of cage layers. Poultry Science: 1695, 1977

Effect of dietary mineral supplements on radius breaking strength and egg characteristics of caged layers. Poultry Science 58(1): 90-92, 1979

Effects of cage size, bird density, body weight and phase feeding on performance of commercial layers. Dissertation Absts. (B). 29: 3564B, 1969

Location in the cage and diurnal distribution of feather pecking by caged layers. British Poultry Science 28(4): 653-658, 1987

Effect of pullet body weight and nutrient density on performance of caged layers. Poultry Science 50(5): 1576, 1971

Cage type and density effects on performance and economic factors of caged layers. Poultry Science 61(10): 1944-1949, 1982

Cage type and density effects on performance and economic factors caged layers. Poultry Science 61(10): 1944-1949, 1982