Home
  >  
Section 2
  >  
Chapter 1,526

Allometric genetics: development of methods which permit mapping of non-Mendelian unit segregations (low penetrance)

Miranda, L.T. de; Miranda, L.E.C. de

Maize Genetics Cooperation Newsletter 61: 31

1987

Accession: 001525641
Download citation:  
Text
  |  
BibTeX
  |  
RIS
A mathematical demonstration is presented of the technique known as allometric genetics (see Maize Genetics Cooperation Newsletter (1981) No. 55, 18-19).

Full Text Article emailed within 1 workday: $29.90




Related References

Rizki, T.M.; Rizki, R.M. 1981: Genetics of tumor-W in Drosophila melanogaster: mapping a gene with incomplete penetrance Journal of Heredity 72(2): 78-80
Miranda, L.T. de; Miranda, L.E.C. de 1990: Allometric genetics: mapping of gametophyte gene Ga10 Maize Genetics Cooperation News Letter 64: 34-35
Miranda, L.E.C. de; Miranda, L.T. de 1988: Allometric genetics and reciprocal translocation backcrosses for general mapping Maize Genetics Cooperation Newsletter 62: 38-39
Pchelarov, V. 1972: Deviations in phenotype from Mendelian segregations in pea Genetika zernovykh bobovykh kul' tur: 73-77
Haldane, J.B.S. 1939: Note on the Preceding Analysis of Mendelian Segregations Biometrika 31(1-2): 67-71
Haldane, J.B.S. 1939: Note on the preceding analysis of Mendelian segregations Biometrika 31(1-2): 67-71
Christis, W.; Wriedt, C. 1930: Seasonal effects on Mendelian segregations and sex ratios Hereditas 14(2): 173-196
Rangaswami Ayyangar, G.N.; Sankara Ayyar, M.A.; Panduranga Rao, V.; Kunhikoran Nambiar, A. 1936: Mendelian segregations for juiciness and sweetness in sorghum stalks Madras Agric. J 24: 247-48
Pritchard, R.H. 1959: Irregular or non-Mendelian segregations encountered in fungi and other plants Proceedings of the IX International Botanical Congress, Montreal, August, 1959, 1959. 2: 310-11
Heyland, D.K. 2016: Should We PERMIT Systematic Underfeeding in All Intensive Care Unit Patients? Integrating the Results of the PERMIT Study in Our Clinical Practice Guidelines JPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition 40(2): 156-158
Mundkur, B.D. 1949: Evidence excluding mutations, polysomy, and polyploidy as possible causes of non-Mendelian segregations in Saccharomyces Ann Missouri Bot Garden 36(3): 259-280
Magomedmirzaev, M.M. 1974: Population methods of pheno genetics of quantitative characters in plants part 2 allometric method Genetika 10(4): 27-36
Magomedmirzaev, M.M. 1974: Population methods in the pheno genetics of plant quantitative traits communication part 2 allometric analysis Soviet Genetics (English Translation of Genetika) 10(4): (1975)
Hernandez, D.G.; Reed, X.; Singleton, A.B. 2016: Genetics in Parkinson disease: Mendelian versus non-Mendelian inheritance Journal of Neurochemistry 139(Suppl 1): 59-74
Geiringer, H. 1949: On some mathematical problems arising in the development of Mendelian genetics Journal of the American Statistical Association 44(248): 526-547
Huang, Z.; Tong, C.; Bo, W.; Pang, X.; Wang, Z.; Xu, J.; Gai, J.; Wu, R. 2014: An allometric model for mapping seed development in plants Briefings in Bioinformatics 15(4): 562-570
Wittman, K.S.; Hamburgh, M. 1968: The development and effect of genetic background on expressivity and penetrance of the Brachyury mutation in the mouse: a study in developmental genetics Journal of Experimental Zoology 168(2): 137-145
Mittelsten Scheid, O. 2022: Mendelian and non-Mendelian genetics in model plants Plant Cell 34(7): 2455-2461
Whittemore, A.S.; Keller, J.B.; Ward, M.J. 1991: Family data determine all parameters in Mendelian incomplete penetrance models Annals of Human Genetics 55(2): 175-177
Humphreys, M.W.; Thorogood, D. 1992: Disturbed Mendelian segregations at isozyme marker loci in early backcrosses ofLolium multiflorum Festuca pratensishybrids toL. multiflorum Euphytica 66(1-2): 11-18