EurekaMag.com logo
+ Site Statistics
References:
54,215,046
Abstracts:
30,230,908
PMIDs:
28,215,208
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
EurekaMag Most Shared ContentMost Shared
EurekaMag PDF Full Text ContentPDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full TextRequest PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on FacebookFollow on Facebook
Follow on TwitterFollow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedInFollow on LinkedIn

+ Translate

Assessment of intra-abdominal and subcutaneous abdominal fat: relation between anthropometry and computed tomography



Assessment of intra-abdominal and subcutaneous abdominal fat: relation between anthropometry and computed tomography



American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 45(1): 7-13



The ability to distinguish between intra-abdominal and subcutaneous abdominal fat may be important in epidemiologic and clinical research. In this study anthropometric measurements were taken from 71 men and 34 women presenting for routine computed tomography (CT). Areas of abdominal fat were calculated from CT scans made at the level of the L4 vertebra. The amounts of intra-abdominal and subcutaneous abdominal fat could be accurately predicted from several circumferences, skinfold measurements, body mass index, and age (R2 ranged from 0.79 to 0.84). In addition, it was found that the area of intra-abdominal fat on the CT scan was related to the waist:hip circumference ratio (r = 0.75 in men, r = 0.55 in women) and to the waist:thigh circumference ratio (r = 0.55 in men, r = 0.70 in women). The correlations of the circumference ratios with the areas of subcutaneous fat were invariably lower.(author)

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 001533089

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 3799506

DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/45.1.7



Related references

Computed tomography measurement of abdominal fat deposition in relation to anthropometry. International Journal of Obesity 12(3): 217-225, 1988

The risk of intra-abdominal injuries in pediatric patients with stable blunt abdominal trauma and negative abdominal computed tomography. Academic Emergency Medicine 17(5): 469-475, 2010

Measurement of abdominal and intra-abdominal fat in postmenopausal women by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry and anthropometry: comparison with computerized tomography. International Journal of Obesity and Related Metabolic Disorders 17(1): 45-51, 1993

Spread of intra abdominal effusions and computed tomography in diagnosis of intra abdominal abscesses. Tidsskrift for den Norske Laegeforening 101(30): 1708-1709, 1981

Abdominal computed tomography for the diagnosis of intra-abdominal sepsis in critically injured patients: fishing in murky waters. Archives of Surgery 134(8): 831-6; Discussion 836-8, 1999

Investigation of relation between visceral and subcutaneous abdominal fat volumes and calcified aortic plaques via multislice computed tomography. Vascular 23(4): 396-402, 2016

A multicenter study of the risk of intra-abdominal injury in children after normal abdominal computed tomography scan results in the emergency department. Annals of Emergency Medicine 62(4): 319-326, 2013

Effects of method, age and gender on the assessment of intra-abdominal visceral fat by computed tomography. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise 28(5 SUPPL ): S195, 1996

Significance of computed tomography finding of intra-abdominal free fluid without solid organ injury after blunt abdominal trauma: time for laparotomy on demand. World Journal of Surgery 38(6): 1411-1415, 2015

Accuracy of Computed Tomography in Diagnosis of Intra-abdominal Injuries in Stable Patients with Anterior Abdominal Stab Wounds: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Academic Emergency Medicine, 2018

Evaluation for intra-abdominal injury in children after blunt torso trauma: can we reduce unnecessary abdominal computed tomography by utilizing a clinical prediction model?. Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery 73(2): 371-6; Discussion 376, 2012

Abdominal computed tomography for the diagnosis of intra-abdominal sepsis in critically injured patients: Fishing in murky waters: Velmahos GC, Kamel E, berne TV, et al. Arch Surg 134:831, 1999. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 58(4): 460-461, 2000

Comparison of anthropometric, area- and volume-based assessment of abdominal subcutaneous and visceral adipose tissue volumes using multi-detector computed tomography. International Journal of Obesity 31(3): 500-506, 2006

Computed tomography-based validation of abdominal adiposity measurements from ultrasonography, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and anthropometry. British Journal of Nutrition 104(4): 582-588, 2010

Assessment of abdominal fat distribution in obese patients: anthropometry versus computerized tomography. International Journal of Obesity and Related Metabolic Disorders 16(10): 731-736, 1992