+ Site Statistics
References:
52,654,530
Abstracts:
29,560,856
PMIDs:
28,072,755
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn

+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Biophysical characteristics of peach trees infected with phony peach disease



Biophysical characteristics of peach trees infected with phony peach disease



Physiological & Molecular Plant Pathology 31(1): 25-40



The effect of phony peach disease (PPD) on leaf gas exchange, several growth parameters, and plant water relations was assessed on Prunus perisca (L.) Batsch "Flordaking" peach. The presence of xylem-limited bacteria (XLB) in roots and stems of trees with PPD symptoms was confirmed by phase-contrast microscopy and successful culture on periwinkle wilt medium. Mean predawn leaf conductance (gl) was 0 mmol m-2s-1 and shoot water potential (.PSI.sw) was -0.15 MPa for both PPD and control trees. The only difference between treatments occurred at midday where gl and .PSI.sw of PPD trees were reduced by 25 and 18%, respectively. Reductions in terminal growth, gl, transpiration rate, net CO2 assimilation rate and .PSI.sw were poorly correlated with XLB concentration in roots. Turgor pressure (.PSI.p) of shoots was not reduced with PPD. Dwarfing associated with PPD was not consistently related to the bulk modulus of elasticity (.epsilon.) of terminal growth. Stomatal closure of PPD and control leaves occurred at similar leaf water potentials (.PSI.Lw) although in neither case was a distinct threshold .PSI.Lw for stomatal closure apparent. Trees severely infected with PPD (8 cm terminal growth/year) manifested a 12-18% reduction in midday net CO2 assimilation rate, a 15-25% reduction in midday gl, and a 0.2-0.6 MPa decline in midday .PSI.sw throughout the spring and summer. The decline in A appeared to be due to stomatal closure associated with increased water stress. Significant increases in Mn, Na, and Al were diagnosed in leaves of PPD-trees. The hydraulic conductance (L) of root terminals and root and stem pieces was not significantly affected by PPD. Root L, whether determined with vacuum or pressure, was not related to extractable XLB cm-3 xylem. In contrast to earlier reports, we conclude that the relatively minor reductions in midday .PSI.sw may be insufficient to entirely explain PPD symptoms. The relevance of these findings is discussed.

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 001537726

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

DOI: 10.1016/0885-5765(87)90004-X



Related references

Xylem water potential of peach trees infected with phony disease. HortScience 18(5): 719-721, 1983

Water potential of peach prunus persica trees infected with phony disease. Hortscience 18(2): 166, 1983

Leafhopper vectors of phony peach disease feeding site preference and survival on infected and uninfected peach and seasonal response to selected host plants. Journal of Entomological Science 22(1): 11-22, 1987

Response of phony infected peach trees to gibberellic acid. Proceedings of the American Phytopathological Society 4: 176, 1977

Effect of number of bacteria on cold injury of rooted cuttings from phony-infected and uninfected peach trees. HortScience 19(1): 423-424, 1984

Occurrence of a rickettsia-like bacterium in the xylem of peach trees with phony disease. Phytopathology 63(11): 1422-1423, 1973

Rickettsia like bacteria in peach prunus persica roots preceded development of visual symptoms of phony peach disease and changes in leaf elemental concentrations. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 106(6): 780-782, 1981

A virus disease of Peach (phony Peach.). Rev. Path. Veg. et Ent. Agric, 17: 8-9, 383-384, 1930

Vacuum extraction of rickettsia like bacteria from peach trees affected with phony disease. Proceedings of the American Phytopathological Society 1: (1975), 1974

Transmission of phony disease virus from tops of certain affected Peach and Plum trees. Phytopathology, 43: 12, 691-696 p, 1953

Transmission of phony disease virus from tops of certain affected peach and plum trees. Phytopath 43(12): 691-696, 1963

Geographical and seasonal occurrence abundance and distribution of phony peach disease vectors and vector response to age and condition of peach orchards and a disease host survey of johnson grass for rickettsia like bacteria in the southeastern usa. Journal of the Georgia Entomological Society 18(3): 410-418, 1983

Phony disease influences peach leaf characteristics. Hortscience 24(6): 1000-1002, 1989

Effect of number of bacteria on cold injury of rooted cuttings from phony infected and uninfected peach prunus persica cultivar jefferson trees. Hortscience 19(3 SECT 1): 423-424, 1984

The incidence of phony disease in plum thickets as related to proximity of infected peach orchards. Phytopathology. 42: 287, 1952