EurekaMag.com logo
+ Site Statistics
References:
53,869,633
Abstracts:
29,686,251
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
EurekaMag Most Shared ContentMost Shared
EurekaMag PDF Full Text ContentPDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full TextRequest PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on FacebookFollow on Facebook
Follow on TwitterFollow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedInFollow on LinkedIn

+ Translate

Comparison of serologic screening tests for brucellosis



Comparison of serologic screening tests for brucellosis



Journal of Clinical Microbiology 25(10): 1969-1972



The slide agglutination test (SAT), microagglutination test (MAT), and card agglutination test (CAT) were compared with each other, using the tube agglutination test (TAT) as the standard method, by two reference laboratories to determine effectiveness as screening tests for human brucellosis. TAT titers of 1,253 sera tested in both laboratories were compared. In one laboratory, 1,270 sera were tested by the TAT and SAT, while the other laboratory tested 1,261 sera by both methods. Of these sera, 1,155 were tested in one laboratory by the CAT and 187 sera were tested by the MAT. Compared with that of the TAT (greater than or equal to 160 positive), the sensitivities were 97 to 100% (SAT), 90% (CAT), and 88% (MAT). The specificities were 88 to 89% (SAT), 98% (CAT), and 88% (MAT). For populations with a low prevalence of disease, increased specificity offers higher predictive value, so the CAT and MAT are preferable for screening purposes and the choice between tests depends on the number and frequency of tests performed. All sera reactive in the CAT and MAT should be retested with the TAT.

(PDF emailed within 1 workday: $29.90)

Accession: 001551237

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 3117844



Related references

Comparison of results of the automated complement fixation screening tests with conventional serologic tests in two dairy herds - one with recent and one with chronic brucellosis. Proceedings of the United States Animal Health Association 84: 128-135, 1980

Serologic diagnosis of brucellosis in bovines comparison between elisa immunoglobulin g and classical serologic tests. International Association Of Biological Standardization (Ed ) Developments in Biological Standardization, Vol 56 Brucellosis; 3rd International Symposium, Algiers, Algeria, Apr 18-20, 1983 Xiii+779p S Karger: Basel, Switzerland; New York, N Y , Usa Illus Maps 451-464, 1984

Comparison of serologic tests used in canine brucellosis diagnosis. Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation 6(2): 257-259, 1994

Probabilistic model of the herd-level sensitivity and specificity of four strategies using serologic screening and allergic confirmatory tests in bovine brucellosis. Proceedings of the 9th Symposium of the International Society for Veterinary Epidemiology and Economics, Breckenridge, Colorado, USA, August 6-11-2000: Id 158, 2000

Comparison of serologic tests and bacteriologic culture for detection of brucellosis in swine from naturally infected herds. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 207(10): 1332-1333, 1995

Comparison of five serologic tests and culture for brucellosis in swine experimentally infected with Brucella suis biovar 1. Proceedings Annual Meeting of the United States Animal Health Association 94: 147-152, 1990

Comparison of 6 commercially available Helicobacter pylori serologic screening tests. Clinical Infectious Diseases 25(2): 403, 1997

Comparison of various serological milk tests for screening of ovine brucellosis. Veterinary Medical Journal Giza 48(2): 265-270, 2000

Prevalence of bovine and human brucellosis in western Algeria: comparison of screening tests. Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal 12(1-2): 119-128, 2006

Use of the Rose Bengal antigen for screening bovine brucellosis (comparison with other serological tests). Repositorio de trabalhos do LNIV0(10): 55-60, 1978

Multicenter comparison of serologic tests for celiac disease in the USA Results of phase 1 serologic comparison survey. Gastroenterology 112(4 SUPPL ): A389, 1997

Comparing different serologic tests in Brucellosis patients. 9TH INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS OF IMMUNOLOGY The 9th International Congress of Immunology : 130, 1995

Use of epidemiologic data and serologic tests in bovine brucellosis. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 177(12): 1221-1226, 1980

Skin tests and serologic reactions in chronic brucellosis in man. Polski Tygodnik Lekarski 27(12): 455-458, 1972

Serologic screening for celiac disease in children: a comparison between established assays and tests with deamidated gliadin-derived peptides plus conjugates for both IgA and IgG antibodies. Apmis 117(11): 808-813, 2009