+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
EurekaMag Most Shared ContentMost Shared
EurekaMag PDF Full Text ContentPDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full TextRequest PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on FacebookFollow on Facebook
Follow on TwitterFollow on Twitter
Follow on Google+Follow on Google+
Follow on LinkedInFollow on LinkedIn

+ Translate

Control of fungal diseases by compounds acting as antipenetrants

Crop Protection 5(5): 306-313
Control of fungal diseases by compounds acting as antipenetrants
Antipenetrant action is the basis of disease control by non-fungitoxic concentrations of melanin biosynthesis inhibitors such as tricyclazone, pyroquilon and fhthalide. These compounds block the polyketide pathway, thus preventing melanization of the appressorial walls of Pyricularia oryzae and Colletotrichum species. Non-melanized appressorial walls of these pathogens do not appear to have the proper architecture and rigidity needed to penetrate plant epidermal walls. Moreover, polyketide metabolites which accumulate as a result of inhibition of melanin biosynthesis may interfere with the appressorial penetration process in P. oryzae. Melanin biosynthesis inhibitors are important protectants used for the control of rice blast disease caused by P. oryzae. Cutinase inhibitors are another group of compounds which prevent infection at non-fungitoxic concentrations, apparently by specifically inhibiting cutinase activity. Antipenetrants in this group include diisopropylfluorophosphate and paraoxon. The organophosphate fungicides IBP (Kitazin) and edifenphos (Hinosan) are cutinase inhibitors and display a specific antipenetrant action, but in practice their disease control activity may also involve direct fungitoxicity. The fungicide benomyl degrades to the fungitoxic product carbendazim and butylisocyanate. Superior performance of benomyl as compared to that of carbendazim, which is sometimes observed in disease control, possibly results from the inhibition of cutinase by butylisocyanate. The antibiotic, validamycin A, does not inhibit production of mycelial mass by Rhizoctonia species but blocks hyphal extension and increases branching. This antibiotic may act as an antipenetrant toward Rhizoctonia-type fungi. The development of antipenetrant chemicals offers an interesting approach as a mechanism for control of plant fungal diseases.

Accession: 001554528

DOI: 10.1016/0261-2194(86)90108-0

Download PDF Full Text: Control of fungal diseases by compounds acting as antipenetrants

Related references

Control of fungal plant diseases by nonfungicidal compounds. ACS Symposium series American Chemical Society: 04) 107-115, 1986

Control of fungal plant diseases by non fungicidal compounds. Abstracts of Papers American Chemical Society 188, 1984

Natural compounds to control fungal postharvest diseases. Recent advances in alternative postharvest technologies to control fungal diseases in fruits and vegetables: 127-156, 2007

Use of natural compounds for fungal diseases control in vegetable crops. 2008

Identification of mycotoxin-producing fungal strains: a step in the isolation of compounds active against rice fungal diseases. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 41(10): 1731-1735, 1993

Treatment of diseases caused by parasitic protozoa and fungal diseases by administration of 5 - deoxy-5- ethylthioribose compounds. Official Gazette of the United States Patent & Trademark Office Patents 1207(4): 2945, Feb 24, 1998

Diseases of fenugreek and their control measures, with special emphasis on fungal diseases. Management Of Fungal Plant Pathogens: 5-262, 2010

Prevention of the losses in cereal yield by the control of most important diseases using Bayleton Fungal diseases.1. Materialy sesji naukowej Instytut Ochrony Roslinub 1982) 21(21): 105-115, 1982

Principal diseases of Witloof chicory Fungal and bacterial diseases, control, Cichorium intybus.1. Phytoma (342) 39-41, 1982

Dihydroazole compounds and their use for controlling fungal plant diseases. Official Gazette of the United States Patent & Trademark Office Patents 1210(1): 521-522, May 5, 1998