EurekaMag.com logo
+ Site Statistics
References:
53,214,146
Abstracts:
29,074,682
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
EurekaMag Most Shared ContentMost Shared
EurekaMag PDF Full Text ContentPDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full TextRequest PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on FacebookFollow on Facebook
Follow on TwitterFollow on Twitter
Follow on Google+Follow on Google+
Follow on LinkedInFollow on LinkedIn

+ Translate

Control of soil insect injury by resistance in sweet potato


Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 112(2): 195-197
Control of soil insect injury by resistance in sweet potato
Soil insect root injury to resistant sweet potato [Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam.] cultivars 'Regal' and 'Southern Delite' was compared to injury to 'Jewel' and 'Centennial' in trials with the resistant-standard W-13 and the susceptible-standard SC 1149-19. Injury by three groups of insects was evaluated: the wireworm-Diabrotica-Systena complex (WDS), which includes the southern potato wireworm (Conoderus falli Lane), the tobacco wireworm (C. vespertinus Fabricius), the banded cucumber beetle (Diabrotica balteata LeConte), the spotted cucumber beetle (D. undecimpunctata howardi Barber), the elongate flea beetle (Systena elongata Fabricius), the pale-striped flea beetle (S. blanda Melsheimer), and S. frontalis Fabricius (a flea beetle); the sweet potato flea beetle (Chaetocnema confinis Crotch.); and a white grub (Plectris aliena Chapin). Relative control estimates were obtained by comparison to the susceptible standard. 'Regal' and 'Southern Delite' provided good control of all three insect groups with control of all insect injuries of 79.2% and 81.0%, respectively. 'Jewel' and 'Centennial' were resistant to the sweet potato flea beetle and sustained less damage by WDS than the susceptible standard, but would still be classed as susceptible to WDS. 'Centennial' was as susceptible to the white grub as SC 1149-19. The levels of resistance demonstrated for 'Regal' and 'Southern Delite' would provide growers an alternative to insecticides for the control of these insects.

(PDF 0-2 workdays service: $29.90)

Accession: 001554753



Related references

Effects of previous insect feeding injury to sweet potato on resistance to sweet potato weevil (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) and storage root chemistry. Journal of Entomological Science 38(1): 72-83, 2003

Insect resistance as an adjunct or alternative to insecticides for control of sweet potato soil insects. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 103(4): 443-445, 1978

Resistance of sweet potato cultivars and the effect of cultural methods of control of soil insect damage. 1971

Sweet potato soil insect control. Mississippi Farm Research, 34: 4, 8, 1971

Sweet potato soil insect and nematode control. Hortscience 15(3): 279, 1980

Evaluation of genotypes of sweet potato for soil insect resistance in the State of Sergipe. Ensaios e Ciencia: Serie Ciencias Biologicas, Agrarias, e da Saude 5(2): 27-34, 2001

Soil insect and nematode control investigations in the sweet potato. Hortscience 12(3): 236, 1977

Sweet potato soil insect and nematode control investigations. Hortscience 14(2): 123, 1979

Chemical control study of soil insect pests of sweet potato. PL. Prot. Bull, Taiwan., 8: 1, 90-93, 1966

Management of soil insects and their damage to sweet potato through the use of insect resistant cultivars insecticide and biological control. Hortscience 26(5): 493, 1991