EurekaMag.com logo
+ Site Statistics
References:
53,214,146
Abstracts:
29,074,682
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
EurekaMag Most Shared ContentMost Shared
EurekaMag PDF Full Text ContentPDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full TextRequest PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on FacebookFollow on Facebook
Follow on TwitterFollow on Twitter
Follow on Google+Follow on Google+
Follow on LinkedInFollow on LinkedIn

+ Translate

Commercial evaluation of tomato varieties for processing



Commercial evaluation of tomato varieties for processing



Vegetable Science 15(2): 181-184



Four cultivars were assessed for 14 physico-chemical characters, and the data are tabulated. Fruit size was greatest in Punjab Kesri, locule number and acidity in S-12, pericarp thickness in Punjab Chhuhara, and TSS and TSS:acid ratio in Roma.

(PDF 0-2 workdays service: $29.90)

Accession: 001780223

Download citation: RISBibTeXText



Related references

Evaluation of some commercial varieties and promising F-1 hybrids of tomato for processing into puree. Journal of Scientific & Industrial Research (India) 55(4): 259-262, 1996

Evaluation of some commercial varieties and promising hybrids of tomato grown in Himachal Pradesh for processing into juice. Journal of Scientific & Industrial Research (India) 55(3): 174-177, 1996

New processing tomato varieties released for commercial production. Konz. Paprikaipar. 2, 43-7, 1967

Studies on the physico-chemical characteristics and processing quality of two IIHR tomato varieties in relation to commercial cultivars. Journal of Food Science & Technology 31(2): 126-129, 1994

Agronomic and commercial evaluation of some processing tomato hybrids. Informatore Agrario 57(3): 75-79, 2001

Commercial evaluation of pea varieties for processing. Journal of Research Punjab Agricultural University 23(3): 420-423, 1986

Evaluation of some tomato F-1 hybrids involving some of the popular commercial varieties. Progressive Horticulture 10(4): 13-18, 1979

Evaluation of tomato varieties for processing. Res. Summ. Ohio agric. Res. Dev. Cent, 21, 43 p, 1967

Evaluation of tomato varieties for processing. 1971

Agronomic evaluation of different varieties red tomato for commercial production in Western Mexico. Hortscience 36(3): 537-538, June, 2001

Evaluation of processing tomato varieties in Arkansas. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting, Arkansas State Horticultural Society: 34-38, 1979

Evaluation of processing tomato varieties for Indiana. Research Bulletin, Purdue University Agricultural Experiment Station (897): 6, 1973

Studies on the suitability for processing of tomato varieties of determinate type. I. On the yields of juice and puree of several tomato varieties. J. Jap. Soc. hort. Sci, 34: 139-44. bibl. 17, 1965

Evaluation of tomato commercial cultivars and lines for fresh market and processing use. Acta Horticulturae ( 533): 543-548, 2000

Physico-chemical qualities of fruits of commercial tomato hybrids and varieties in Ghataprabha Left Bank Command (GLBC) area for processing into puree. Journal of Food Science and Technology Mysore 42(1): 8-11, 2005