EurekaMag.com logo
+ Site Statistics
References:
52,725,316
Abstracts:
28,411,598
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
EurekaMag Most Shared ContentMost Shared
EurekaMag PDF Full Text ContentPDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full TextRequest PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on FacebookFollow on Facebook
Follow on TwitterFollow on Twitter
Follow on Google+Follow on Google+
Follow on LinkedInFollow on LinkedIn

+ Translate

Is the Suppressor-mutator element controlled by a basic developmental regulatory mechanism?


Genetics 120(2): 559-577
Is the Suppressor-mutator element controlled by a basic developmental regulatory mechanism?
We report the results of genetic studies on derivatives of two different alleles of the maize a locus with an insertion of the Suppressor-mutator (Spm) transposable element in which the element is inactive, but can be reactivated readily. We present evidence that the mechanism that determines whether the element is in an active or inactive phase has two genetically distinguishable components. One determines whether or not the element is genetically active (the phase setting) and the other determines the stability of the setting in development, its heritability, and its phase in the next generation (the phase program). We show that the element's phase can be reset in a reproducible pattern during plant development. We also show that the Spm element can be reprogrammed to undergo a subsequent phase change without a concomitant phase change. The capacity to reset and reprogram the Spm element is differentially expressed within the plant in a pattern that is correlated with the developmental fate of apical and lateral meristems, suggesting the involvement of a basic developmental determination mechanism.


Accession: 001871135

PMID: 2848747



Related references

Molecular genetic analysis of the maize Suppressor-mutator element's epigenetic developmental regulatory mechanism. Genome 31(2): 973-979, 1989

Molecular mechanisms in the developmental regulation of the maize Suppressor-mutator transposable element. Genes & Development 2(11): 1364-1380, 1988

Patterns of developmental and heritable change in methylation of the suppressor mutator transposable element. Developmental Genetics 10(6): 425-437, 1989

Mutations, epimutations, and the developmental programming of the maize Suppressor-mutator transposable element. Bioessays 10(5): 139-144, 1989

Deletions within a defective suppressor-mutator element in maize affect the frequency and developmental timing of its excision from the bronze locus. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 82(14): 4783-4787, 1985

Deletions within a defective suppressor mutator element in maize zea mays affect the frequency and developmental timing of its excision from the bronze locus. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 82(14): 4783-4787, 1985

Molecular genetic analysis of the maize Suppressor-mutator elements epigenetic developmental regularity mechanism. Genome 1(2): 973-979, 1989

Regulation of the maize suppressor mutator element. Lambert, M E , J F Mcdonald And I B Weinstein (Ed ) Banbury Report, Vol 30 Eukaryotic Transposable Elements As Mutagenic Agents; Conference, Cold Spring Harbor, New York, Usa, April 21, 1987 Xvi+345p Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory: Cold Spring Harbor, New York, Usa Illus 63-70, 1988

The suppressor-mutator element and the evolutionary riddle of transposons. Genes to Cells 4(1): 11-19, 1999

Positive and negative regulation of the suppressor-mutator element. Plant transposable elements edited by Oliver Nelson, 1988