+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
EurekaMag Most Shared ContentMost Shared
EurekaMag PDF Full Text ContentPDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full TextRequest PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on FacebookFollow on Facebook
Follow on TwitterFollow on Twitter
Follow on Google+Follow on Google+
Follow on LinkedInFollow on LinkedIn

+ Translate

Pollen competition, nonrandom fertilization, and progeny fitness: a reply to Charlesworth

Pollen competition, nonrandom fertilization, and progeny fitness: a reply to Charlesworth

American Naturalist 132(2): 303-308

Pollen competition is briefly discussed in relation to a critique published by D. Charlesworth (see American Naturalist (1988) 132, 298-302).

(PDF same-day service: $19.90)

Accession: 001912452

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

DOI: 10.2307/2461874

Related references

The effect of pollen load and pollen grain competition on fertilization success and progeny performance in Fagopyrum esculentum. Euphytica 83(1): 47-52, 1995

Evidence for pollen competition in plants and its relationship to progeny fitness: a comment. American Naturalist 132(2): 298-302, 1988

Pollen competition and sporophyte fitness in Brassica campestris: Does intense pollen competition result in individuals with better pollen?. Oikos 69(1): 80-86, 1994

The effects of pollen competition on progeny vigor in Fragaria virginiana (Rosaceae) depend on progeny growth environment. International Journal of Plant Sciences 163(2): 335-340, 2002

Does stronger pollen competition improve offspring fitness when pollen load does not vary?. American Journal of Botany 103(3): 522-531, 2015

Pollen performance traits reveal prezygotic nonrandom mating and interference competition in Arabidopsis thaliana. American Journal of Botany 103(3): 498-513, 2016

Differential pollen-tube growth rates and nonrandom fertilization in Hibiscus moscheutos (Malvaceae). American Journal of Botany 78(10): 1419-1426, 1991

Genetic evidence for nonrandom fertilization in alfalfa as influenced by differential pollen tube growth. Crop Sci 3(4): 295-297, 1963

The effect of competition on the fitness of hybrid and BC1 progeny of wild and cultivated radish,. Ecological Society of America Annual Meeting Abstracts 86: 224, 2001

Reply to Charlesworth. American Naturalist 149(3): 604-605, 1997

Reply from B. Charlesworth. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 5(1): 31-31, 1990

Effects of cross and self-fertilization on progeny fitness in Lobelia cardinalis and L. siphilitica. Evolution 46(3): 688-702, 1992

Effects of pollen competition on progeny performance in a heterozygous cucurbit. American Naturalist 142(4): 694-706, 1993

Evolution of dominance. Charlesworth's reply. Nature, UK 280(5723): 613, 1979

Self fertilization in amphicarpum purshii its influence on fitness and variation of progeny from aerial panicles. American Midland Naturalist 116(2): 394-402, 1986