EurekaMag.com logo
+ Site Statistics
References:
47,893,527
Abstracts:
28,296,643
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
EurekaMag Most Shared ContentMost Shared
EurekaMag PDF Full Text ContentPDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full TextRequest PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on FacebookFollow on Facebook
Follow on TwitterFollow on Twitter
Follow on Google+Follow on Google+
Follow on LinkedInFollow on LinkedIn

+ Translate

Systems for producing leaner beef


, : Systems for producing leaner beef. Agricultural Systems 15(3): 171-188

A stochastic model was designed to simulate the productive and economic characteristics over the past 5 yr of 2 conventional and 4 lean beef systems (3 of which utilized bulls) of growing-finishing beef cattle in southern Ontario [Canada]. Each system was based on 100 ha of land with (A) annually feeding 1 lot of 300 cattle with remaining maize utilized in a cash crop enterprise or (B) expanding the feedlot capacity dependent on feed resources. Within option A, lean beef systems marketed an average of 965 kg corn in addition to each tonne of beef produced. Compared to the average of the conventional systems within option B, lean bull beef systems produced 29% more total beef and cost an average of 6.8% less/kg gain. Production of lean beef reduced production costs but not enough to offset reduced returns received under current grading and pricing schemes. Utilization of processing technologies (i.e., electrical stimulation) may reduce price differentials between lean and fatter carcasses with increased profitability of lean vs. conventional beef production systems.

Accession: 001962922

DOI: 10.1016/0308-521X(84)90026-X

Download PDF Full Text: Systems for producing leaner beef


Submit PDF Full Text

No spam - Every submission is manually reviewed

Due to poor quality, we do not accept files from Researchgate

Submitted PDF Full Texts will always be free for everyone
(We only charge for PDFs that we need to acquire)

Select a PDF file:
Close
Close

Related references

Savell, Jw, 1990: Nutrient composition of beef. Leaner beef retail cuts: impact on beef composition data. In the latter part of the 1980's, beef as presented to the consumer became leaner because new, closer fat-trimming specifications became commonplace. In 1988, the average fat thickness for all retail cuts from across the United States was les...

Quan, C., 1991: Beef--leaner than ever. Cattle are now bred and fed to be leaner than ever. With 27% less fat than it had in 1980, beef has new menu appeal. Grades, aging, color, purchasing, storage, cooking and nutritional value are among the topics discussed.

Anonymous, 1981: Leaner beef. Livestock breeder journal 24(7): 182

Francis, J.J., 1988: Consumers want leaner beef - and get it. Per capita spending on beef in the USA dropped from 2.7% of disposable income in 1960 to 2.4% in 1968. Since then more women have joined the workforce, raising the demand for convenience foods, new lifestyles have emerged and there is increased di...

Stothart, Jg, 1970: The widened search for leaner beef

Gerrietts, M., 1992: Leaner beef benefits the health conscious. Agricultural research US Department of Agriculture Agricultural Research Service 40(1): 8-10

Ewart, J., 1986: Producing leaner broilers. 2. A geneticist's view. Genetic influences on total body fat and the relationship between total carcass fat and abdominal fat are discussed.

Smith, Gh, 1986: Opportunities for producing larger, leaner lambs. Proceedings of the Australian Society of Animal Production6(16): 99-100

Hollis, Gilbert R., 1989: Porcine somatotropin: a tool for producing leaner hogs more efficiently. Veterinary Medicine 84: 88-94

Anonymous, 1988: Beefplan results - beef cattle at grass, dairy beef systems, suckler beef systems. Financial results of beef producers participating in Beefplan, the Meat and Livestock Commission's recording and management service, in the 1987 growing season are presented. The higher performance of the top beef cattle from grass producers,...