EurekaMag.com logo
+ Site Statistics
References:
52,725,316
Abstracts:
28,411,598
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
EurekaMag Most Shared ContentMost Shared
EurekaMag PDF Full Text ContentPDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full TextRequest PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on FacebookFollow on Facebook
Follow on TwitterFollow on Twitter
Follow on Google+Follow on Google+
Follow on LinkedInFollow on LinkedIn

+ Translate

Canopy leaf area development and age-class dynamics in cotton


Crop science 32(2): 451-456
Canopy leaf area development and age-class dynamics in cotton
Leaf senescence contributes to reduced canopy photosynthesis when new leaf initiation cannot compensate for increased leaf aging after canopy closure. However, since leaf aging is seldom addressed in wholeplant investigations, it is difficult to evaluate how age-class composition influences crop productivity. Field studies were conducted to examine leaf area development in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) and to incorporate this information into a simulation model for assessing canopy age-class dynamics. Simulated results indicated that leaf area produced during rapid canopy expansion (60 DAP [days after planting], LAI [leaf area index] = 2.3) was largely composed of young leaves, with >35% of the LAI being <14 d old. However, 30 d later (90 DAP, LAI = 4.5) leaf area production was no longer sufficient to offset leaf aging and the percentage LAI <14 d old decreased to <10%, while leaves > 29 d old increased to 75%. This shift in age-class composition toward progressively older leaves altered the relative contribution of C from differing layers within the canopy. The middle portion of the canopy was the most important contributor of C early in crop growth, supplemented by roughly equal contributions from the lower and upper canopies. However, after 90 DAP the supply of assimilate from the upper canopy rapidly increased to >45% and that of the lower canopy decreased dramatically. Towards the end of the season (120 DAP), the middle and upper portions of the canopy were about equally divided in their importance to late-season C production. These results highlight the dynamic nature of age-related processes within the cotton canopy and the importance of leaf area development in sustaining whole-plant C production.


Accession: 002042676



Related references

The dynamics of a maize canopy development 2. leaf area growth. Biotronics 19: 99-108, 1990

Canopy dynamics and the morphological development of Abies balsamea: effects of foliage age on specific leaf area and secondary vascular development. Tree Physiology 15(1): 47-55, 1995

Canopy dynamics of Eucalyptus maculata Hook. II. Canopy leaf area balance. Australian journal of botany2(4): 405-413, 1984

Canopy dynamics of eucalyptus maculata 2. canopy leaf area balance. Australian Journal of Botany 32(4): 405-414, 1984

Seasonal leaf area-leaf weight relationship in the cotton canopy. Agronomy Journal 81: 4, 1989

Seasonal leaf area-leaf weight relationships in the cotton canopy. Agronomy Journal 81(1): 1-4, 1989

Dynamic simulation of leaf area in cotton canopy. Nongye Jixie Xuebao = Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery 38(6): 117-120, 2007

Calibration and validation of hyperspectral indices for the estimation of broadleaved forest leaf chlorophyll content, leaf mass per area, leaf area index and leaf canopy biomass. Remote Sensing Of Environment2: 10, 3846-3864, 2008

Canopy light interception, dry weight and leaf area of upland cotton lines. Revista Ciencia Agronomica 36(1): 67-73, 2005

Structure and development of sugar beet canopy. 1. Leaf area-leaf angle relations. Photosynthetica 6(4): 401-409, 1972