EurekaMag.com logo
+ Site Statistics
References:
53,517,315
Abstracts:
29,339,501
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
EurekaMag Most Shared ContentMost Shared
EurekaMag PDF Full Text ContentPDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full TextRequest PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on FacebookFollow on Facebook
Follow on TwitterFollow on Twitter
Follow on Google+Follow on Google+
Follow on LinkedInFollow on LinkedIn

+ Translate

Emergence of Staphylococcus aureus L-form colony formation following antibiotic therapy of subclinical mastitis



Emergence of Staphylococcus aureus L-form colony formation following antibiotic therapy of subclinical mastitis



Journal of Dairy Science 74(Supplement 1): 203 (P183)



Staphylococcus aureus-infected quarters were selected for intramammary antibiotic therapy in a commercial dairy. 16 quarters of 10 cows were treated with 3 infusions of 200 mg Na cloxacillin. Milk samples were aseptically collected prior to treatment, and 60 h, 7, 14 and 21 days post-treatment.

(PDF 0-2 workdays service: $29.90)

Accession: 002095754

Download citation: RISBibTeXText



Related references

Cure rates of chronic subclinical Staphylococcus aureus mastitis in lactating dairy cows after antibiotic therapy. Berliner und Munchener Tierarztliche Wochenschrift 126(7-8): 291-296, 2015

Subclinical mastitis caused by Staphylococcus aureus: cost benefit analysis of antibiotic therapy in lactating cows. Arquivo Brasileiro de Medicina Veterinaria e Zootecnia 59(3): 577-585, 2007

Physicochemical, cellular and productive changes of cow mammary quarters with subclinical mastitis caused by Staphylococcus aureus when submitted to antibiotic therapy. Boletim de Industria Animal 62(4): 359-369, 2007

Effect of double antibiotic infusions on subclinical Staphylococcus aureus mastitis in the dry period. Hayvanclk Arastirma Dergisi 9(1/2): 71-76, 1999

Factors affecting response of subclinical Staphylococcus aureus mastitis to antibiotic treatment. Journal of Dairy Science 57(5): 645, 1974

Biofilm-formation by Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis isolates from subclinical mastitis in conditions mimicking the udder environment. Polish Journal of Veterinary Sciences 18(4): 787-792, 2016

Antibiotic resistance of Staphylococcus aureus strains and a biological method of controlling subclinical mastitis in cows. Medycyna Weterynaryjna 45(2): 85-87, 1989

Antibiotic Resistance in Staphylococcus aureus and Coagulase Negative Staphylococci Isolated from Goats with Subclinical Mastitis. Veterinary Medicine International 2010: 517060-517060, 2010

Investigation of the antibiotic resistance and biofilm-forming ability of Staphylococcus aureus from subclinical bovine mastitis cases. Journal of Dairy Science 99(11): 8607-8613, 2016

Clinical and subclinical Staphylococcus aureus mastitis in dairy buffaloes: disease characteristics and antibiotic susceptibility profiles of isolates. International Journal of Agricultural Research 2(9): 804-811, 2007

Prevalence and control of subclinical bovine mastitis in Sardinia. II. In vitro antibiotic sensitivity of Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus strains. Atti della Societa Italiana delle Scienze Veterinarie 37: 719-722, 1983

Hypermutable Staphylococcus aureus strains present at high frequency in subclinical bovine mastitis isolates are associated with the development of antibiotic resistance. Veterinary Microbiology 165(3-4): 410-415, 2014

A comparative randomized field trial on intramammary and intramuscular dry cow antibiotic treatment of subclinical Staphylococcus aureus mastitis in dairy cows. Journal of Veterinary Medicine. A, Physiology, Pathology, Clinical Medicine 53(8): 418-422, 2006

Use of partial budgeting to determine the economic benefits of antibiotic treatment during lactation of chronic subclinical mastitis caused by Staphylococcus aureus. Mastitis in dairy production: current knowledge and future solutions: 217-223, 2005

Isolation of L-form variants after antibiotic treatment in Staphylococcus aureus bovine mastitis. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 191(6): 681-684, 1987