EurekaMag.com logo
+ Site Statistics
References:
52,725,316
Abstracts:
28,411,598
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
EurekaMag Most Shared ContentMost Shared
EurekaMag PDF Full Text ContentPDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full TextRequest PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on FacebookFollow on Facebook
Follow on TwitterFollow on Twitter
Follow on Google+Follow on Google+
Follow on LinkedInFollow on LinkedIn

+ Translate

The effects of enzyme supplementation on the nutritive value of rye grain (Secale cereale) for the young broiler chick


Poultry Science 70(12): 2501-2508
The effects of enzyme supplementation on the nutritive value of rye grain (Secale cereale) for the young broiler chick
Two dose-response experiments utilizing differing enzyme concentrations were carried out to determine the level of a crude enzyme preparation (Trichoderma viride cellulase) required to obtain maximum growth performance in young broiler chicks fed a 60% rye diet. Enzyme concentrations utilized in these studies ranged from.05 to 12.8 g enzyme/kg diet. Enzyme supplementation at the 3.2 g/kg diet level yielded increases in feed consumption and weight gain of 71 and 193%, respectively; and the feed to gain ratio was improved by 43% compared with that for the unsupplemented rye control diet. As no further growth response was obtained by increasing the enzyme concentration, the enzyme level utilized in a subsequent study was 3.2 g/kg diet. A balance study using 2-wk-old broiler chicks was carried out to determine the effect of enzyme supplementation on the bioavailable energy (AME(n)) and apparent protein digestibility (APD) of a 60% wheat diet replaced by rye in 10% increments. In the 60% rye diets, the enzyme addition increased the dietary AME(n) and APD by 23 and 12%, respectively, compared with the unsupplemented diet. The AME(n) and APD of the 60% wheat control diet were increased 9.7 and 4.6%, respectively, by enzyme addition. The data suggest that the AME(n) of rye grain is increased by enzyme supplementation; however, alternate methodology will have to be employed to quantitatively determine the extent of these improvements.


Accession: 002249105

PMID: 1784572

DOI: 10.3382/ps.0702501



Related references

Nutritive value of triticale triticum durum x secale cereale used as chick feed. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 46(6): 299-302, 1976

The effect of storage of cereal grain and enzyme supplementation on measurements of AME and broiler chick performance. Canadian journal of animal science 81(2): 237-243, 2001

The effects of polyethylene glycol or enzyme supplementation on the nutritive value of rye for broiler chicks. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 67(4): 1198-1199, 1987

The effects of selenium and PUFA supplementation in the diet of young broiler breeders on the incorporation of selenium in the egg and in the tissues of the day old broiler chick. British Poultry Science 45 Suppl 1: S26-S27, 2004

The effect of enzyme supplementation on the apparent metabolizable energy and nutrient digestibilities of wheat, barley, oats, and rye for the young broiler chick. Poultry Science 71(10): 1710-1721, 1992

Evaluation of rye secale cereale grain in the diets of young holstein calves and lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 64(3): 441-448, 1981

Studies of cultivation model of rye (Secale cereale L.) as a forage crop. I. Effects of harvesting time on forage production and quality of rye (Secale cereale L.) silage on paddies. Journal of the Korean Society of Grassland Science 8(3): 165-168, 1988

Effects of different varieties and fertilizer rates on the production of forage Secale cereale II: Effects on the hay quality of forage Secale cereale. Acta Prataculturae Sinica 14(4): 72-81, 2005

Genetic and environmental effects on rye grain secale cereale production in florida usa. Soil & Crop Science Society of Florida Proceedings 44: 167-170, 1985

Effects of enzyme supplementation to corn or wheat based diets containing low energy and protein on broiler chick performance. Turk Veterinerlik ve Hayvanclk Dergisi 25(3): 227-232, 2001