EurekaMag.com logo
+ Site Statistics
References:
52,725,316
Abstracts:
28,411,598
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
EurekaMag Most Shared ContentMost Shared
EurekaMag PDF Full Text ContentPDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full TextRequest PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on FacebookFollow on Facebook
Follow on TwitterFollow on Twitter
Follow on Google+Follow on Google+
Follow on LinkedInFollow on LinkedIn

+ Translate

The effects of stand structure after thinning on the growth of an Allegheny hardwood stand


Forest science 37(4): 1182-1200
The effects of stand structure after thinning on the growth of an Allegheny hardwood stand
A 50-year-old Allegheny hardwood stand in which the crown canopy had stratified into distinct species groups was thinned to 60% relative density leaving dramatically different stand structures and species composition. Treatments included combined thinning, thin from middle, thin from above, thin from below, and unthinned control. Individual tree growth was stimulated most by thinnings that created openings in the main crown canopy and still retained adequate numbers of the larger stems of the faster growing species. Thinning from below, which removed primarily noncommercial saplings and small poles of the shade-tolerant species, did not affect diameter growth of the larger stems. Total stand growth in basal area and volume was dramatically reduced by thinning from above, which removed nearly all of the larger stems and faster growing species. Treatments that reduced growing stock in the largest size classes, where most of the stand value is concentrated, had a detrimental effect on future timber values. Best individual tree growth, and best stand growth in basal area, cubic volume, board volume, and dollar value occurred in the combined thin treatment. Future yields after any thinning can be viewed as the net effect of reduction in the amount of growing-stock capital and increases in residual tree growth resulting from reduced competition. Recommendations for appropriate types of thinning and timing of the first thinning in stands such as this are provided.


Accession: 002249516



Related references

Pin cherry effects on Allegheny hardwood stand development. Canadian journal of forest research 29(1): 73-84, 1999

Long-term responses of ecosystem components to stand thinning in young lodgepole pine forest: III. Growth of crop trees and coniferous stand structure. Forest Ecology and Management 228(1/3): 69-81, 2006

Change in the stand structure of a natural fir-hemlock-hardwood secondary mixed stand in the Ehime University Forest. (I) Development of the growing-stock of the main stand from 1968 to 1980. (Analysis from the viewpoint of management by the check method). Bulletin of the Ehime University Forest (25): 1-13, 1987

Studies on the effects of thinning small diametered trees. (V). Changes in stand conditions and biomass of Cryptomeria japonica D. Don stand during six years after thinning. Journal of the Japanese Forestry Society 57(7): 215-223, 1975

Change in the stand structure of a natural fir hemlock hardwood secondary mixed stand in the ehime university forest japan i. development of the growing stock of the main stand from 1968 1980 analysis from the viewpoint of management by the check method. Bulletin of the Ehime University Forest (25): 1-14, 1987

Disturbance history and stand dynamics along a topographic gradient in old-growth hemlock-northern hardwood forests of the Allegheny Plateau, USA. Natural Areas Journal 23(2): 98-113, 2003

Stand structure and growing space efficiency following thinning in an even aged douglas fir stand. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 18(7): 859-866, 1988

Growth after thinning a 35-year-old natural stand to different loblolly pine and hardwood basal areas. Southern Journal of Applied Forestry 21(4): 168-174, Nov, 1997

Development of stand structure and first thinning of a widely spaced pine stand. Forstarchiv 55(1): 10-17, 1984

Effects of hurricane damage on individual growth and stand structure in a hardwood forest in New Hampshire, USA. Journal of Ecology 80(4): 787-795, 1992