EurekaMag.com logo
+ Site Statistics
References:
52,725,316
Abstracts:
28,411,598
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
EurekaMag Most Shared ContentMost Shared
EurekaMag PDF Full Text ContentPDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full TextRequest PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on FacebookFollow on Facebook
Follow on TwitterFollow on Twitter
Follow on Google+Follow on Google+
Follow on LinkedInFollow on LinkedIn

+ Translate

The efficiency of fluorescent lamps in young lettuce plant production


Norwegian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 5(3): 261-268
The efficiency of fluorescent lamps in young lettuce plant production
The relative efficiency of six different kinds of fluorescent lamps for growth and development of young Lactuca sativa L. plants was examined. The experiments were carried out in a greehouse under winter light conditions (latitude 60.degree. N), and in growing rooms without natural daylight. The irradiance level of all lamps in the experiments was 15 W m-2 (in the wavelength range 400-1000 nm) and plants were irradiated for 18 h day-1 over a period of three weeks. In greenhouses, as in growing rooms, growth in terms of fresh and dry weight as well as leaf number and chlorophyll content were higher for plants grown in light from Osram L/Fluora than those grown in light from the other lamps. Used only as a greenhouse supplemental light source, there were no differences in plant growth or development between Philips TLD/33 and Philips TLD/84. In growing rooms, however, Philips TLD/33 was more effective than the latter. As judged by fresh and dry weight Atlas Warm White was less effective than the former light sources in all cases, while Philips TLD/83 was the least effective light source in both greenhouse and growing rooms. Measurement of the spectral energy distribution as well as the recorded growth responses showed that the effects of Philips TLD/84 and Osram L/Lumilux were identical.


Accession: 002249740



Related references

Plant growth characteristics under omnidirectional illumination ii. light power consumption for lettuce production under close illumination by fluorescent lamps. Environment Control in Biology 25(1): 1-6, 1987

High efficiency fluorescent excimer lamps: an alternative to mercury based UVC lamps. Review of Scientific Instruments 84(12): 123108-123108, 2014

Comparative studies on the production of strongly tillered plants of certain forage plant species grown under artificial light (fluorescent lamps - halide metal vapour lamp 1000 deg C). A contribution to generation acceleration in plant breeding. Archiv fur Zuchtungsforschung 4(1): 57-64, 1974

Comparison of fluorescent and high-pressure sodium lamps on growth of leaf lettuce. Hortscience 22(3): 424-425, 1987

Tests with fluorescent lamps for their suitability for investigations on lettuce virus, with special reference to their decreasing effect with increasing duration of use. Preliminary communication. Gartenbauwiss, 29: 171-5. bibl 2, 1964

Results of photometric investigations on the use of high-pressure discharge lamps for additional illumination in young plant production German Democratic Republic.1. Archiv fur Gartenbau0(2): 95-107, 1982

Plant propagation under fluorescent lamps. Pap. Bur. Plant Industry, Soils and Agricultural Engineering, U.S.D.A, 5, 1946

Comparison of fluorescent lamps, high pressure mercury halogen lamps and high pressure sodium vapour lamps in raising tomato plants. Gartneryrket 67(1): 15-17, 1976

The influence of the type of fluorescent lamps on the growth of young vegetable plants. Acta Horticulturae (Wageningen) 22: 95-100, 1971

Relative efficiency of fluorescent and incandescent lamps in inhibiting flower induction in Chrysanthemum morifolium Albatross. Acta Horticulturae 68: 1-58, 1977