EurekaMag.com logo
+ Translate

Balancing sampling effort in pitfall trapping of carabid beetles


, : Balancing sampling effort in pitfall trapping of carabid beetles. Entomologica Fennica 1(4): 233-238

Samples of carabids were collected from two study areas in southern Finnish coniferous forest using continuous pitfall trapping throughout the breeding season. These were compared with samples from combinations of early and late season sampling periods (5+5, 10+10 or 14+14 days in each combination). The same species were abundant in both the smaller samples from combinations of periods and in the whole season samples. There was considerable variation in the total catch of carabids among the 10-day samples (5+5 days) which mainly reflected fluctuation in catch of the abundant species in the early season. About 42% of the total number of species was caught in every 10-day sample, 52% in every 20-day sample, and 67% and 77% in every 28-day sample. Most species not caught during the shorter trapping periods were scarce in the whole season sample (< 10 individuals). We suggest that samples obtained by trapping periods of 20 days or more were similar enough to the whole season sample to be used in several types of ecological studies.

(PDF 0-2 workdays service)

Accession: 002308093

Submit PDF Full Text: Here


Submit PDF Full Text

No spam - Every submission is manually reviewed

Due to poor quality, we do not accept files from Researchgate

Submitted PDF Full Texts will always be free for everyone
(We only charge for PDFs that we need to acquire)

Select a PDF file:
Close
Close

Related references

Niemala J.; Halme, E.; Pajunen, T.; Haila, Y., 1986: Sampling spiders and carabid beetles with pitfall traps: the effect of increased sampling effort. The effects of increased sampling effort on samples of carabids and spiders taken in pitfall traps was investigated in a coniferous forest in Finland in August 1984. Using up to 15 traps on 2 occasions, totals of 10 species of carabids (148 indivi...

Bhat, PS.; Rajagopal, D., 1993: A study on pitfall trapping of carabid beetles Coleoptera Carabidae. Journal of Soil Biology and Ecology. March; 131: 44-49

Lövei, G.L.; Magura, T., 2011: Can carabidologists spot a pitfall? The non-equivalence of two components of sampling effort in pitfall-trapped ground beetles Carabidae. Sampling effort in pitfall trapping sessions is routinely calculated as a product of trap numbers and time period, expressed in units of trap-days or trap-weeks. This assumes that these two components contribute equally to the catch, so that the c...

Waage B.E., 1985: Trapping efficiency of carabid beetles in glass and plastic pitfall traps containing different solutions. The trapping efficiency of carabid beetles in glass and plastic traps containing 4% formol, soapy water, water and empty traps was tested. No differences were found in trapping efficiency between glass and plastic traps containing formol and soapw...

Jarosik V., 1992: Pitfall trapping and species abundance relationships a value for carabid beetles coleoptera carabidae. Patterns of species-abundance distribution in natural assemblages of adult carabid beetles from pitfall traps in different habitats were compared with distributions predicted either from lognormal distribution or niche preemption log-series patter...

Faragalla, AA.; Adam, EE., 1985: Pitfall trapping of tenebrionid and carabid beetles (Coleoptera) in different habitats of the central region of Saudi Arabia. The abundance of Tenebrionidae and Carabidae was investigated in the central region of Saudi Arabia in 1982-83, in habitats including fig, grapevine and citrus orchards, a harvested wheat field and a natural desert site. Pitfall trapping indicated...

Anonymous, 1963: Ecology of two carabid beetles, Bembidign Lampros and Trechus Quadristriatus II Studies on populations of adults in the field, with special reference to the technique of pitfall trapping

Winder, L.H.lland, J.; Perry, J.; Woolley, C.A.exander, C., 2001: The use of barrier-connected pitfall trapping for sampling predatory beetles and spiders. The efficiency of barrier-connected pitfall trapping was compared to conventional single traps or arrays. For ground-active beetles, the use of a pitfall system incorporating a wetting agent with five traps arranged in a cross formation connected...

Mitchell, B., 1963: Ecology of two carabid beetles, Betnbidion lampros (Herbst) and Trechus quadristriatus (Schrank). II. Studies on populations of adults in the field, with special reference to the technique of pitfall trapping. Journal of Animal Ecology, 32: 377-392

Mitchell, B., 1963: Ecology of two Carabid beetles, Bembidion lampros (Herbst) and Trechus quadristriatus (Schrank). II. Studies on populations of adults in the field, with special reference to the technique of pitfall trapping. The following is based on the author's summary of this second part of a series dealing with observations on the predatory Carabids Bembidion lampros (Hbst.) and Trechus quadristriatus (Schr.) in cabbage plots in central England . Both species...