+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
EurekaMag Most Shared ContentMost Shared
EurekaMag PDF Full Text ContentPDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full TextRequest PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on FacebookFollow on Facebook
Follow on TwitterFollow on Twitter
Follow on Google+Follow on Google+
Follow on LinkedInFollow on LinkedIn

+ Translate

Balancing sampling effort in pitfall trapping of carabid beetles

Entomologica Fennica 1(4): 233-238

Balancing sampling effort in pitfall trapping of carabid beetles

Samples of carabids were collected from two study areas in southern Finnish coniferous forest using continuous pitfall trapping throughout the breeding season. These were compared with samples from combinations of early and late season sampling periods (5+5, 10+10 or 14+14 days in each combination). The same species were abundant in both the smaller samples from combinations of periods and in the whole season samples. There was considerable variation in the total catch of carabids among the 10-day samples (5+5 days) which mainly reflected fluctuation in catch of the abundant species in the early season. About 42% of the total number of species was caught in every 10-day sample, 52% in every 20-day sample, and 67% and 77% in every 28-day sample. Most species not caught during the shorter trapping periods were scarce in the whole season sample (< 10 individuals). We suggest that samples obtained by trapping periods of 20 days or more were similar enough to the whole season sample to be used in several types of ecological studies.

(PDF 0-2 workdays service: $29.90)

Accession: 002308093

Related references

Sampling spiders and carabid beetles with pitfall traps: the effect of increased sampling effort. Annales Entomologici Fennici 52(3): 109-111, 1986

A study on pitfall trapping of carabid beetles Coleoptera Carabidae. Journal of Soil Biology and Ecology. March; 131: 44-49, 1993

Can carabidologists spot a pitfall? The non-equivalence of two components of sampling effort in pitfall-trapped ground beetles Carabidae. Community Ecology 12(1): 18-22, 2011

Trapping efficiency of carabid beetles in glass and plastic pitfall traps containing different solutions. Fauna Norvegica Series B 32(1): 33-36, 1985

Pitfall trapping and species abundance relationships a value for carabid beetles coleoptera carabidae. Acta Entomologica Bohemoslovaca 89(1): 1-12, 1992

Pitfall trapping of tenebrionid and carabid beetles (Coleoptera) in different habitats of the central region of Saudi Arabia. Zeitschrift Fuer Angewandte Entomologie: 995: 466-471, 1985

Ecology of two carabid beetles, Bembidign Lampros and Trechus Quadristriatus II Studies on populations of adults in the field, with special reference to the technique of pitfall trapping. 1963

The use of barrier-connected pitfall trapping for sampling predatory beetles and spiders. Entomologia experimentalis et applicata 98(3): 249-258, 2001

Ecology of two Carabid beetles, Bembidion lampros (Herbst) and Trechus quadristriatus (Schrank). II. Studies on populations of adults in the field, with special reference to the technique of pitfall trapping. J. Anlm. Ecol, Oxford, 32: 3, 377-392. f, 1963

A comparison of pitfall trapping and sou sampling in assessing populations of two species of ground beetles (Col.: Carabidae). E. Mailing Res. Sta. Rep., 1961. 108-112, 1961