EurekaMag.com logo
+ Site Statistics
References:
52,725,316
Abstracts:
28,411,598
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
EurekaMag Most Shared ContentMost Shared
EurekaMag PDF Full Text ContentPDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full TextRequest PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on FacebookFollow on Facebook
Follow on TwitterFollow on Twitter
Follow on Google+Follow on Google+
Follow on LinkedInFollow on LinkedIn

+ Translate

Beak trimming effects on beak length and feed usage for growth and egg production






Poultry Science 71(11): 1830-1841

Beak trimming effects on beak length and feed usage for growth and egg production

Two experiments were conducted to compare beak treatment effects on pullets of three genetic stocks. Within each stock, equal numbers were assigned to three treatments: no beak trimming (IN), beak trimming once (1X), and beak trimming twice (2X). Beak treatment, genetic stock, and age effects along with interactions among main effects were examined for production-associated traits during rearing and brief periods of early egg production. Beaks of 1X and 2X pullets remained shorter than those of IN pullets through final measurements at 36 and 32 wk of age in Experiments 1 and 2, respectively. However, differences in beak length decreased as age increased. Upper beaks of 2X pullets remained shorter than those of 1X pullets, but lower beaks of 1X and 2X pullets did not differ by 20 wk in Experiment 2. Weight gains, feed usage, and efficiency of growth were affected by beak treatments. Beak trimming reduced gains, feed eaten, feed wasted, and total feed used, and 2X pullets used their feed more efficiently for weight gain and egg production. A general decrease occurred in differences among beak treatments for weight gains, feed eaten, feed wasted, and efficiency of gains with increasing age during rearing. Nevertheless, significant differences in feed consumed, feed wasted, and efficiency of feed used for egg production indicated an economic advantage in favor of beak trimming.


Accession: 002308569

PMID: 1437970

DOI: 10.3382/ps.0711830



Related references

Beak trimming of turkeys. 2. Effects of arc beak trimming on weight gain, feed intake, feed wastage, and feed conversion. Poultry Science 76(5): 668-670, 1997

Different effects of infrared and one-half hot blade beak trimming on beak topography and growth. Poultry Science 89(12): 2559-2564, 2011

Beak trimming of turkeys. 1. Effects of three methods of beak trimming on body weight and mortality of six genetic lines. Poultry Science 75(6): 702-704, 1996

Performance comparisons of no beak trimming and two commercial beak trimming regimens under light controlled conditions. Poultry Science 73(SUPPL 1): 159, 1994

Effect of beak trimming, blade temperature, and age at beak trimming on performance of two strains of egg layers. Journal of Applied Poultry Research 3(1): 69-73, 1994

Effect of beak trimming technique on beak integrity and performance in growing pullets. Poultry Science 81(Supplement 1): 100, 2002

Anatomical consequences of partial beak amputation (beak trimming) in turkeys. Research in Veterinary Science 58(2): 158-162, 1995

Neuroma formation following partial beak amputation (beak trimming) in the chicken. Research in Veterinary Science 41(3): 383-385, 1986

Behavioural consequences of partial beak amputation (beak trimming) in poultry. British Poultry Science 30(3): 479-488, 1989

Effect of age at beak-trimming on cannibalism, beak regrowth and mortality of White Leghorn Pullets. Veterinary Practitioner 6(2): 146-147, 2005