+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Economic feasibility of wheat (Triticum aestivum) and mustard (Brassica juncea) intercropping under limited water-supply condition



Economic feasibility of wheat (Triticum aestivum) and mustard (Brassica juncea) intercropping under limited water-supply condition



Indian Journal of Agronomy 37(3): 541-543



In field trials in the winter seasons of 1986-88 under limited water conditions at Pantnagar, Uttar Pradesh wheat UP 2003 and B. juncea PR 35 were grown alone or intercropped in 1:1, 4:2, 6:2 or 10:2 row ratios. Wheat yield was 3.62-3.74 t/ha when grown alone and 2.31-3.30 t when intercropped; the 10:2 row ratio gave the highest wheat intercrop yield.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 1 workday: $29.90)

Accession: 002351819

Download citation: RISBibTeXText


Related references

Production potential of wheat triticum aestivum and indian mustard brassica juncea intercropping system under limited water supply. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 61(11): 835-837, 1991

Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L.) intercropping under limited irrigation. Journal of Research, Birsa Agricultural University 17(1): 35-38, 2005

Spatial arrangement in wheat (Triticum aestivum)-Indian mustard (Brassica juncea) intercropping. Indian Journal of Agronomy 40(1): 91-93, 1995

Production potential of wheat triticum aestivum and indian mustard brassica juncea intercropping system. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 60(9): 625-626, 1990

Intercropping of wheat (Triticum aestivum) with rapeseed (Brassica napus) and mustard (B. juncea) under rainfed conditions. Indian Journal of Agronomy 37(3): 543-545, 1992

Effect of various row ratios, mustard variety and fertility levels on growth and development of component crops under wheat (Triticum aestivum) and Indian mustard (Brassica juncea) intercropping system. 2007

Performance of wheat (Triticum aestivum) plus Indian mustard (Brassica juncea) intercropping in relation to row ratio, Indian mustard variety and fertility levels. Indian Journal of Agronomy 51(2): 107-111, 2006

Water use by wheat triticum aestivum chickpea cicer arietinum and mustard brassica juncea ssp juncea grown as sole crops and intercrops. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 56(3): 187-193, 1986

Yield advantage and reciprocity functions of wheat Triticum aestivum plus Indian mustard Brassica juncea intercropping under varying row ratio, variety and fertility level. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 77(3): 139-144, 2000

Productivity, compatibility and economics of wheat (Triticum aestivum) and Indian mustard (Brassica juncea) intercropping as influenced by farmyard manure and fertilizer levels under irrigated conditions. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 88(4): 530-539, 2018

Yield attributes, yield and economics of wheat (Triticum aestivum) plus compact mustard (Brassica juncea) intercropping under 5:1 row proportion in relation to fertility levels and seeding densities of two wheat varieties. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 82(9): 787-793, 2012

Production potential and competitive indices of Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L.) based intercropping with wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and lentil (Lens culinaris L.) under different row ratios of eastern Uttar Pradesh. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science 60(2): 225-237, 2014

Transport and Partitioning of Lead in Indian Mustard ( Brassica juncea ) and Wheat ( Triticum aestivum ). Bioremediation Journal 18(4): 345-355, 2014

Effect of incorporation of crop straw residues on the yield of mustard brassica juncea and wheat triticum aestivum. Soil Use & Management 2(1): 11-12, 1986

Response of wheat triticum aestivum indian mustard brassica juncea and barley hordeum vulgare to soil salinity in field. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 60(9): 588-591, 1990