EurekaMag.com logo
+ Site Statistics
References:
52,725,316
Abstracts:
28,411,598
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
EurekaMag Most Shared ContentMost Shared
EurekaMag PDF Full Text ContentPDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full TextRequest PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on FacebookFollow on Facebook
Follow on TwitterFollow on Twitter
Follow on Google+Follow on Google+
Follow on LinkedInFollow on LinkedIn

+ Translate

Factorial estimation of daily energy expenditure in university students: comparison with recorded energy intake


Australian Journal of Nutrition and Dietetics 48(3): 95-99
Factorial estimation of daily energy expenditure in university students: comparison with recorded energy intake
This study compares factorial estimates of energy expenditure (EE) obtained using a new '16-activity category' method with records of energy intake (EI) in 113 nutrition students (49 females, 12 males external students, and 46 females, 6 males internal) with a view to determining food energy requirements. EI was measured from 7-day weighed dietary records. Activity level and EE were measured from 7-day records of times spent in 16 activity categories and their average energy costs expressed as multiples of basal metabolic rate (BMR). Body weight change during the 7-day study was recorded. Female external students were more active and had a higher EE than internal students (activity levels of 1.61 X BMR (sd 0.10) and 1.50 X BMR (sd 0.09) respectively, p < 0.001, and EE's of 9.03 MJ/d (sd 0.76) and 8.40 MJ/d (sd 0.82) respectively, p < 0.001). Energy intake was the same in the internal and external female groups (7.4 MJ/d, sd 1.23 and 1.67). In all groups, EI was significantly lower than EE (11-19% lower in females, p < 0.01-0.001; and 12.5% lower in males, p < 0.05), the ratio EI:BMR was lower than 1.4 X BMR, and body weight tended to be lost during the study. Estimation of daily EE from EI adjusted for the energy content of weight change (assuming an energy content of 32 kJ/g of weight change) gave EE values which were 3-5% less than but not significantly different from the factorial estimates of EE. These results suggest that 7-day records of EI underestimated EE and energy requirements in our subjects.


Accession: 002379728



Related references

Comparison of estimates of energy expenditure with measures of energy intake in female external university students. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society of Australia 13: 148, 1988

Validation of a pre-coded food diary used among 60-80 year old men: comparison of self-reported energy intake with objectively recorded energy expenditure. Plos One 9(7): E102029-E102029, 2015

Energy expenditure of urban Colombian women: a comparison of patterns and total daily expenditure by the heart rate and factorial methods. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 63(6): 870-878, 1996

The impact of energy supplementation on daily energy intake and energy expenditure levels of guatemalan sugarcane cutters. Federation Proceedings 38(3 PART 1): 866, 1979

Daily energy balance in children and adolescents. Does energy expenditure predict subsequent energy intake?. Appetite 60(1): 58-64, 2013

Prediction of energy expenditure: simplified FAO/WHO/UNU factorial method vs continuous respirometry and habitual energy intake. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 48(5): 1188-1196, 1988

Energy intake, expenditure and pattern of daily activity of Nigerian male students. British Journal of Nutrition 58(3): 357-367, 1987

Can recorded energy intake be used to estimate energy expenditure?. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 52(3): 342A, 1993

Comparison of measuring energy expenditure with indirect calorimetry and traditional estimation of energy expenditure in patients in intensive care unit. Zhongguo Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue 23(7): 392-395, 2012

Energy expenditure in free-living smokers and nonsmokers: comparison between factorial, intake-balance, and doubly labeled water measures. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 63(1): 15-21, 1996