EurekaMag.com logo
+ Site Statistics
References:
52,725,316
Abstracts:
28,411,598
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
EurekaMag Most Shared ContentMost Shared
EurekaMag PDF Full Text ContentPDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full TextRequest PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on FacebookFollow on Facebook
Follow on TwitterFollow on Twitter
Follow on Google+Follow on Google+
Follow on LinkedInFollow on LinkedIn

+ Translate

Inventory of land management inputs for producing absorbent fiber for diapers: a comparison of cotton and softwood land management


Forest Products Journal 44(6): 39-45
Inventory of land management inputs for producing absorbent fiber for diapers: a comparison of cotton and softwood land management
A previous life cycle analysis (LCA) compared the reusable cloth diaper and disposable paper diaper with respect to energetic and environmental effects during manufacture, consumer use, and disposal. However, data are lacking on the first phase of the LCA--the chemical and natural resource inputs required to plant, maintain, and harvest cotton lands for the cloth diaper and softwood forests for the paper diaper. In this inventory study, data for cotton and southern softwood production in the United States were compiled in terms of the following inputs: irrigation water, fuel, fertilizers, biocides, soil amendments, and harvest aids. Inputs required for cotton fiber generally exceeded those for paper fiber. Depending on the specific growing region, production of 1 kg of cotton fiber requires up to four orders of magnitude more irrigation water than 1 kg of diaper pulp. Chemical and natural resource inputs were expressed on the basis of 1,000 equivalent diaperings for commercially laundered cloth, home-laundered cloth, and paper diapers using assumptions for the fiber content of diapers, the life span of the cloth diaper, and a market share estimate for home- and commercially laundered cloth diapers. On this basis, cloth diapering consumes about four times more fertilizer, 27 times more biocide, and 450 times more irrigation water than the paper diaper system. Production of softwood pulpwood for the paper diaper consumed about three times more fuel than for cotton. Biocide requirements for 1 kg of cotton fiber were up to 500 times higher, with several applications required per year, compared to 2 to 3 applications required over a 24-year period for softwood. Fertilizer inputs for cotton were up to 150 times greater than for softwood. Lime and harvest aids were generally not used on softwood forests, but were required in amounts of 84 and 2 g, respectively, for the production of 1 kg of cotton. The dataset suggests an environmental trade-off exists among the diapering systems: no one diapering system is superior in terms of required chemical and natural resource inputs.


Accession: 002416630



Related references

Abandoned mined land inventory; U. S. Bureau of Land Management. Special Publication United States: u of Mines. Pages 416. 1994., 1994

Land inventory and traditional agro-technology information as basis for the mapping of land management units in Central Mexico. Publication, International Institute for Land Reclamation and Improvement/ILRI (40): 154-173, 1986

Land inventory aids arid land management. Journal of the Soil Conservation Service of New South Wales: 32 (3) 133-142, 1976

Land information and land evaluation for land use planning and sustainable land management. Land Chatham 1(1): 27-44, 1997

Land exchange in Idaho, building and land conveyance in Sandpoint, ID, Washoe Indian Tribe Trust, amend Federal Land Policy and Management Act and Land Exchange in Coconino and Tonto National Forests. 2003

Promoting improved land management practices on Australian farms: a survey of Landcare and land management related programs. ABARE Research Report ( 98.4): viii + 70 pp., 1998

Fire ecology and Aboriginal land management in central Arnhem Land, northern Australia: A tradition of ecosystem management. Journal of Biogeography 28(3): 325-343, 2001

Vegetation management perspectives on public land administered by the Bureau of Land Management in the eastern Sierra region. Open-File Report - U S, 2001

A case study on land management in Tengzhou, Shandong Province, the selection of the most efficient model to balance the total area of construction land and arable land by evaluating the potential of the proposed arable land areas. Zhejiang Nongye Kexue: 390-393, 2008

Land policies, land management and land degradation in the Hindu Kush-Himalayas. Nepal Study Report. MFS Case Study Series International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development ( 00/2): viii + 98 pp., 2000