EurekaMag.com logo
+ Site Statistics
References:
52,725,316
Abstracts:
28,411,598
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
EurekaMag Most Shared ContentMost Shared
EurekaMag PDF Full Text ContentPDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full TextRequest PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on FacebookFollow on Facebook
Follow on TwitterFollow on Twitter
Follow on Google+Follow on Google+
Follow on LinkedInFollow on LinkedIn

+ Translate

Invertebrate herbivory on the submerged macrophyte Potamogeton perfoliatus in a Danish stream


Freshwater Biology 31(1): 43-52
Invertebrate herbivory on the submerged macrophyte Potamogeton perfoliatus in a Danish stream
1. Invertebrate herbivory on the submerged macrophyte Potamogeton perfoliatus was studied in a Danish lowland stream during the main growth seasons of summer 1991 and 1992. Young apical leaves escaped consumption probably because of their location and dense packing, but herbivory loss increased linearly with age and exposure time of older leaves. Nitrogen content was relatively high in both young (4.61% DW) and old leaves (3.65% DW) but a food preference experiment showed that young leaves were preferred by the main herbivore, the trichopteran Anabolia nervosa. 2. The percentage of standing plant biomass lost to herbivory (the apparent loss) between sampling periods increased from early May to a mid-June maximum (24.8% in 1991, 4.2% in 1992), and subsequently declined to zero within a month. The averages for the growth seasons were 10.5% in 1991 and 2.0% in 1992. Yet, the proportions of annual plant production harvested by herbivores were low and almost the same (1.3 and 1.8%) because consumption was low when plant production peaked in late summer. Consumption was almost the same early in the two years, but plant growth dynamics differed markedly and was the main factor determining apparent herbivory loss. 3. Despite heavy damage early in the summer, P. perfoliatus contributed a minor fraction (1-5%) of the trichopteran diet. This fraction appeared to be restricted by the low macrophyte biomass during early summer. 4. The results emphasize that apparent herbivory loss does not estimate the harvested proportion of plant production, and that plant growth dynamics should be analysed to attain precise estimates of herbivory rates.

Accession: 002416666

DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2427.1994.tb00837.x

Download PDF Full Text: Invertebrate herbivory on the submerged macrophyte Potamogeton perfoliatus in a Danish stream



Related references

Variability of invertebrate herbivory on the submerged macrophyte Potamogeton perfoliatus. Freshwater Biology 34(2): 357-365, 1995

Modelling the clonal growth of the rhizomatous macrophyte Potamogeton perfoliatus. Ecological Modelling 192(1-2): 67-82, 2006

Photosynthesis and canopy structure of a submerged plant potamogeton pectinatus in a danish lowland stream. Journal of Ecology 77(4): 947-962, 1989

The effect of macrophyte-cutting on the invertebrate fauna in a Danish lowland stream. Symposium: Status over den danske plante og dyreverden Copenhagen, 1980: 211-226, 1980

Comparison of methods for measuring productive by the submersed macrophyte potamogeton perfoliatus l. Limnology & Oceanography 31(6): 1322-1334, 1986

Comparison of methods for measuring production by the submersed macrophyte, Potamogeton perfoliatus L. Limnology and Oceanography 31: 22-34, 1986

The ratio of production and destruction characteristics of the phytoplankton, epiphyton and macrophyte Potamogeton perfoliatus L. Biologicheskie Nauki (Moscow) 0(3): 74-80, 1992

Temporal responses of the macrophyte potamogeton perfoliatus and its associated autotrophic community to atrazine exposure in estuarine microcosms. Estuaries 7(4B): 519-530, 1984

Oxygen release from roots of the submersed macrophyte potamogeton perfoliatus l regulating factors and ecological implications. Aquatic Botany 26(none): 271-283, 1986

Uptake and phytotoxicity of soil-sorbed atrazine for the submerged aquatic plant, Potamogeton perfoliatus L. Archives of environmental contamination and toxicology 13(2): 237-241, 1984