+ Translate

Investigating optimal bull:heifer ratios required for estrus-synchronized heifers

, : Investigating optimal bull:heifer ratios required for estrus-synchronized heifers. Journal of Animal Science 71(2): 291-297

The objectives of this study were to determine 1) the effect of bull:heifer ratio on reproductive performance and associated costs and returns on heifers in synchronized estrus and 2) the effect of estrus synchronization on reproductive performance and economic variables, in a multiple-sire, pasture breeding situation. Eight hundred yearling beef heifers and 28 mature, sexually experienced beef bulls were allotted to four treatments (two replicates per treatment) at bull:heifer ratios of 2 per 100 (1:50; Treatment 1), 2 per 100 (1:50; Treatment 2), 4 per 100 (1:25; Treatment 3), and 6 per 100 (1:16; Treatment 4). Treatment 1 (control) used nonsynchronized heifers, whereas heifers in Treatments 2, 3, and 4 were synchronized using the 33-d melengestrol acetate (MGA)-prostaglandin F2 alpha (PGF2 alpha) program. Pregnancy results after a 28-d breeding season indicate that there may be a limit to how many estrus-synchronized heifers bulls can impregnate. Treatment 2 showed a 6% decrease (P < .10) in pregnancy rate (77%) compared with Treatment 3 (83%), indicating that the bulls probably were not able to service all the synchronized heifers. Treatments 3 and 4 had similar pregnancy rates (83 and 84%, respectively). Treatment 4 had a 3-d advantage (P < . 01) over Treatment 3 in average day of conception. However, based on economic analysis, Treatment 3 exhibited greater returns. Estrus synchronization failed to provide any advantage in pregnancy rate or day of conception. For unknown reasons, the control, nonsynchronized heifers cycled and conceived as if they were synchronized. Treatment 2 had a 5% decrease in pregnancy rate compared with Treatment 1 (77 vs 82%; P < .10) with no difference in average day of conception. Consequently, Treatment 1 (nonsynchronized) exhibited greater economic returns. Results of this study indicated that the optimal bull:heifer ratio for estrus-synchronized heifers was 1:25. In this study, estrus synchronization failed to provide an advantage in terms of reproductive performance or economic efficiency.

(PDF 0-2 workdays service)

Accession: 002416683

PMID: 8440646

Submit PDF Full Text: Here

Submit PDF Full Text

No spam - Every submission is manually reviewed

Due to poor quality, we do not accept files from Researchgate

Submitted PDF Full Texts will always be free for everyone
(We only charge for PDFs that we need to acquire)

Select a PDF file:

Related references

Healy V.M.; Boyd G.W.; Mortimer R.G.; Piotrowski J.R., 1991: Investigating the optimal bull to female ratios required for estrus synchronized heifers. Journal of Animal Science 69(SUPPL 1): 571

Chapman J.D.; Kiser T.E.; Landmeier B.J.; Calvert G.V., 1978: Heifer to bull ratios for optimum fertility following synchronized estrus with cloprostenol ici 80996. Journal of Dairy Science 61(SUPPL 1): 124

Ohta M.; Masaki J.; Sasada H.; Wada R.; Nihei A., 1979: Serving activity of a beef bull to heifers in which estrus was synchronized. Sexual behavior and reproductive efficiency of a Nihon Tankaku (Japanese Shorthorn) bull to 11 heifers were examined in a 10 m .times. 15 m free barn where they were housed for 48 h during the winter of 1977. Ten of the heifers were injected with...

Pruitt, R.; Corah, L.; Simms, D.; Spire, M., 1982: Natural mating of estrus-synchronized heifers and indicators of bull fertility. Report of progress Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station Kansas State College of Agriculture and Applied Science: (413) 79-82

Rocha, J.L.; Madureira, E.H.; Barnabe, R.C., 1999: Estrus characteristics and ovulation in crossbreed beef heifers synchronized and in nelore cows and heifers with natural estrus, detected utilizing HEAT-WATCH system. From october/98 to april/99 crossbreed beef heifers and nelore cows and heifers, were observed to evaluate estrus and ovulation in synchronized and nature cycles. Syncronization of estrus was made with MGA/PGF system and to synchronize the emergen...

Pursley, J.R.; Wiltbank, M.C.; Stevenson, J.S.; Ottobre, J.S.; Garverick, H.A.; Anderson, L.L., 1997: Pregnancy rates per artificial insemination for cows and heifers inseminated at a synchronized ovulation or synchronized estrus. Two synchronization protocols were tested for lactating dairy cows and heifers. Nulliparous dairy heifers (13 to 23 mo; n = 155) and primiparous and multiparous dairy cows (60 to 289 d postpartum; n = 310) were assigned randomly to two treatments....

Purvis, H.T.; Whittier, J.C.; Allen, K.S.; Lalman, D.L., 1993: Resynchronization of second estrus with melengestrol acetate or norgestomet following a synchronized estrus in beef heifers. Journal of Animal Science 71(SUPPL 1): 235

Stevenson, J.S.; Smith, M.W.; Jaeger, J.R.; Corah, L.R.; LeFever, D.G., 1996: Detection of estrus by visual observation and radiotelemetry in peripubertal, estrus-synchronized beef heifers. The effectiveness of two estrus-detection methods (visual observation and radiotelemetric, pressure-sensitive, rump-mounted devices) was compared in peripubertal, crossbred yearling beef heifers. Heifers (n = 50) were fitted with a pressure-sensit...

Richardson, A.M.; Hensley, B.A.; Marple, T.J., 2002: Characteristics of estrus before and after first insemination and fertility of heifers after synchronized estrus using GnRH, PGF2a and progesterone. Journal of Animal Science 80(11): 92-800

Richardson, A.M.; Hensley, B.A.; Marple, T.J.; Johnson, S.K.; Stevenson, J.S., 2002: Characteristics of estrus before and after first insemination and fertility of heifers after synchronized estrus using GnRH, PGF2alpha, and progesterone. Our objectives were to determine fertility of heifers after synchronization of estrus using PGF(2alpha), preceded by progesterone (P4), GnRH, or both, and to examine the variability of estrual characteristics in heifers before first and second AI....