EurekaMag.com logo
+ Site Statistics
References:
53,214,146
Abstracts:
29,074,682
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
EurekaMag Most Shared ContentMost Shared
EurekaMag PDF Full Text ContentPDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full TextRequest PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on FacebookFollow on Facebook
Follow on TwitterFollow on Twitter
Follow on Google+Follow on Google+
Follow on LinkedInFollow on LinkedIn

+ Translate

Investigation of anabolic steroids in two taste aversion paradigms






Appetite 20(1): 1-11

Investigation of anabolic steroids in two taste aversion paradigms

Tha adversive effects of estradiol have been studied in two different taste aversion paradigms. A similar investigation was undertaken for the anabolic-androgenic steroids, nandralone and testosterone cypionate, using Rockland-Swiss mice. Experiments 1 and 2 used the brief exposure of a novel saccharin solution as the conditioned stimulus for taste aversion learning, and showed that anabolic steroids (1 mg) do not induce taste aversions. Instead, these hormones induced a small non-contingent increase in saccharin perference. Experiment 3 showed that daily nandralone administration (1 mg/day) had a greater anabolic effect than the same dose of testosteron cypionate. Experiment 4 paired the continuous exposure to a novel diet with daily nandralone injections, and showed that steroid treatment increased intake of the novel diet. When the novel diet was subsequently presented with the familiar diet in a two-choice preference test, there was no indication that an aversion was conditioned to the novel target diet. On the contrary, nandralone treatment significantly increased the preference for the novel diet. These experiments show that anabolic-androgenic steroids do not have aversive effects in mice, and that they may have positive consequences.

Accession: 002416763

PMID: 8452374

DOI: 10.1006/appe.1993.1001

Download PDF Full Text: Investigation of anabolic steroids in two taste aversion paradigms



Related references

Separation of taste-aversion-prone and taste-aversion-resistant rats through selective breeding: implications for individual differences in conditionability and aversion-therapy alcoholism treatment. Behavioral Neuroscience 100(1): 121-124, 1986

Extinction of taste aversion does not eliminate taste potentiation of odor aversion in rats or color aversion in pigeons. Animal Learning & Behavior 12(4): 414-420, 1985

Comparison of nutritive and nonnutritive stimuli in intestinal and oral conditioned taste aversion paradigms. Behavioral Neuroscience 120(6): 1268-1278, 2007

Two novel paradigms for the simultaneous assessment of conditioned taste aversion and food intake effects of anorexic agents. Physiology & Behavior 79(4-5): 761-766, September, 2003

Effects of toxin magnitude on taste aversion and taste-potentiated aversion to visual cues in chicks (Gallus domesticus). Physiology and Behavior 62(3): 605-609, 1997

Pain sensitivity following taste aversion conditioning: Analgesia depends on the method used to assess taste aversion learning. Learning and Motivation 28(1): 129-139, 1997

Taste aversion inducing effects of cocaine in selectively bred taste aversion prone and resistant rats. Society for Neuroscience Abstracts 17(1-2): 662, 1991

Extinction of taste aversion does not eliminate taste-mediated aversion to visual cues: Replicating Lett (1984). Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 31(5): 426-428, 1993

Differences in free-choice ethanol acceptance between taste aversion-prone and taste aversion-resistant rats. Alcoholism Clinical & Experimental Research 21(8): 1491-1496, 1997

Radial-maze learning by lines of taste-aversion-prone and taste-aversion-resistant rats. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 31(3): 171-174, 1993