EurekaMag.com logo
+ Site Statistics
References:
52,725,316
Abstracts:
28,411,598
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
EurekaMag Most Shared ContentMost Shared
EurekaMag PDF Full Text ContentPDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full TextRequest PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on FacebookFollow on Facebook
Follow on TwitterFollow on Twitter
Follow on Google+Follow on Google+
Follow on LinkedInFollow on LinkedIn

+ Translate

Relations between sociological-ecological species groups and Ellenberg indicator values


Phytocoenologia 23(0): 343-362
Relations between sociological-ecological species groups and Ellenberg indicator values
This study reports on a study on the relations between the ecological indicator values for light, moisture, reaction and nitrogen according to ELLENBERG (1979) and a system of 80 sociological-ecological groups developed for the flora of the Netherlands. This system was refined on the basis of new or corrected information in ELLENBERG (1991), some phytosociological revisions and some corrections of actual indicator values. The resulting groups are homogeneous for all four indicator factors, i.e. they have average values with a standard deviation of less than 1, meaning that 90% of all values are restricted to maximally three adjacent indicator classes. With examples from the Littorelletea and Molinietalia, it is shown that the sociological-ecological groups are syntaxonomically heterogeneous, which implies that the syntaxonomical position of some species and vegetation units should be reconsidered. With an example of dune meadow releves it is shown that the calculation of weighted averages for sites can be improved by subjecting the cover-abundance values to an 'optimum transformation', which relates the performance of species to the maximum performance reached by the species as based on growth form and growth rate. While underlining the need for additional field measurements this study suggests that the ecological indication values have a valuable element of synthesis and integration which incidental measurements may miss.


Accession: 002477636



Related references

Ecological amplitudes of plant species and the internal consistency of ellenberg's indicator values for moisture. Vegetatio 69(1-3): 79-88, 1987

On the consistencies between CSR plant strategies and Ellenberg ecological indicator values. Journal of Applied Botany 81(1): 86-94, 2007

Validation of the ecological-coenotical groups of vascular plant species for European Russian forests on the basis of ecological indicator values, vegetation releves and statistical analysis. Byulleten' Moskovskogo Obshchestva Ispytatelei Prirody Otdel Biologicheskii 111(Part 2): 36-47, 2006

Assessing fungal species sensitivity to environmental gradients by the Ellenberg indicator values of above-ground vegetation. Basic and Applied Ecology 4(6): 557-568, 2003

Classification of mire localities and mire species in central Norway by vegetational regions, Ellenberg species indicator values and climatic data. Gunneria 0(70): 177-198, 1995

Ways to address actual soil acidity on the basis of ellenberg's indicator values without arithmetic means of these values. Tuexenia (7): 499-506, 1987

Do we really need phytosociological classes to calibrate Ellenberg indicator values?. Journal of Vegetation Science 14(4): 615-618, 2003

Calibration of Ellenberg indicator values for the Faroe Islands. Applied Vegetation Science 6(1): 53-62, June, 2003

Calibration of Ellenberg indicator values to the Faroe Islands. Applied Vegetation Science 6(1): 53-62, 2003

The sensitivity of Ellenberg indicator values to the completeness of vegetation releves. Basic and Applied Ecology 4(6): 507-513, 2003