EurekaMag.com logo
+ Site Statistics
References:
53,214,146
Abstracts:
29,074,682
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
EurekaMag Most Shared ContentMost Shared
EurekaMag PDF Full Text ContentPDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full TextRequest PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on FacebookFollow on Facebook
Follow on TwitterFollow on Twitter
Follow on Google+Follow on Google+
Follow on LinkedInFollow on LinkedIn

+ Translate

Relationship between number of conditioning trials per training session and avoidance learning in horses


Applied Animal Behaviour Science 36(4): 291-299
Relationship between number of conditioning trials per training session and avoidance learning in horses
Sxiteen horses were used to determine if number of trials given per training session (5, 10, 15 or 20) affected learning performance in an avoidance conditioning task. The horse had to move from one side of a test pen to the other during an auditory cue presentation to avoid aversive stimulation. A pen 8 m times 3.6 m, divided into two equal sections by a 13-cm diameter plastic pipe lying on the ground, was used as the test pen. Painted plywood panels were fastened to the fence in half the pen to help horses distinguish visually between the two parts. A 10-s auditory cue was used as a signal for horses to move from one side of the test pen to the other. A 20-s intertrial interval was used. Training sessions were conducted every third day. Each trial was recorded as an avoidance (the horse completed the task during auditory cue presentation and avoided aversive stimulus) or an error (the horse received aversive stimulus). After completing ten consecutive avoidances (criterion), the horse was removed from the study. Numbers of training sessions, trials, avoidances and errors until reaching criterion were recorded for each horse. Horses varied greatly within these variables with ranges of 3-18 sessions, 37-121 trials, 20-68 avoidances and 17-53 errors to criterion. No differences were detected (P gt 0.05) in the number of conditioning trials per training session (treatment) for the mean number of trials, avoidances or errors to criterion. Number of training sessions to criterion differed (P lt 0.01) among treatments, indicating that an optimum number of learning trials per training session might exist. Mean sessions to criterion for horses receiving 5, 10, 15 and 20 trials per session were 15.1 +- 1.3, 5.8 +- 1.1, 5.3 +- 1.1 and 4.6 +- 1.1, respectively. Regression analysis indicated that 16.2 trials per training session would minimize number of sessions to criterion. Although it is widely assumed that learning efficiency in horses is decreased when intense activity is concentrated into a small number of sessions, these results indicate that moderate repetition of training activities is needed for efficient learning.

Accession: 002477894

DOI: 10.1016/0168-1591(93)90127-b

Download PDF Full Text: Relationship between number of conditioning trials per training session and avoidance learning in horses



Related references

Number of conditioning trials needed to optimize avoidance learning in horses. Journal of Animal Science 70(SUPPL 1): 156, 1992

Avoidance learning as a function of trials per training session in normal and brain operated cats. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology 55: 455-457, 1962

Relationship between avoidance conditioning and maze learning. Psychol Rept 13(1): 103-106, 1963

Odor avoidance conditioning in D melanogaster The effects of conditioning parameters on avoidance learning. Society for Neuroscience Abstracts 22(1-3): 1405, 1996

Single session contextual fear conditioning remains dependent on the hippocampus despite an increase in the number of context-shock pairings during learning. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory 106: 294-299, 2014

Amygdalar unit activity during three learning tasks: eyeblink classical conditioning, Pavlovian fear conditioning, and signaled avoidance conditioning. Behavioral Neuroscience 119(5): 1254-1276, 2005

Safety signals from avoidance learning but not from yoked classical conditioning training pass both summation and retardation tests for inhibition. Behavioural Processes 66(2): 153-160, 2004

Hippocampal theta-triggered training trials in rabbit classical conditioning Effect on learning. Society for Neuroscience Abstracts 24(1-2): 1914, 1998

Methods of de conditioning persisting avoidance response prevention and counter conditioning after extensive training. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 3((5A)): 345-347, 1974

The relationship between number of training sessions per week and learning in dogs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 111(3-4): 311-320, 2008