+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Repeatability of taste panel tenderness scores and their relationships to objective pig meat quality traits



Repeatability of taste panel tenderness scores and their relationships to objective pig meat quality traits



Journal of Animal Science 71(8): 2018-2025



Repeatabilities of 12 meat quality measurements were calculated as a value for the accuracy of those measurements. Sixty-four Duroc and Dutch Yorkshire boars and gilts were slaughtered during 8 wk. The repeatabilities between carcass halves within animals were .53 for repeated taste panel tenderness scores based on 12.4 observations of different panelists per mean, .08 for two repeated tenderness scores of different panelists within one animal, .50 for two repeated tenderness scores of one panelist within one animal, and .41 for repeated measurements of maximum shear force. Repeatabilities of other meat quality traits ranged from .29 for cooking loss to .76 for the Minolta L* color coordinate. The phenotypic correlation between tenderness assessed by a panel and maximum shear force was -.50. The phenotypic correlation between those traits corrected for measurement errors was -.74. A correlation of zero was found between the total amount of collagen and meat tenderness, between amount of intramuscular fat and tenderness, and between ultimate pH and tenderness. The other correlations with meat tenderness ranged from -.00 for Minolta b* color coordinate to -.44 for drip loss. It was concluded that the measurement of maximum shear force can be used as an effective indicator of pig meat tenderness.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 1 workday: $29.90)

Accession: 002479183

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 8376224


Related references

Beef tenderness. I. Objective and subjective measurement. Correlation between shear values and taste-panel scores. Ann Zootechnie paris 13(1): 93-102, 1964

Consistency statistics and genetic parameters for taste panel assessed meat quality traits and their relationship with carcass quality traits in a commercial population of Angus-sired beef cattle. Animal 4(1): 1-8, 2010

Relationships between taste panel assessment and meat quality in pigs. BRITISH SOCIETY OF ANIMAL SCIENCE Author Proceedings of the British Society of Animal Science, : 106, 1997

Comparison between shear values and taste panel scores for predicting tenderness of broilers. Poultry Science 53(6): 2042-2046, 1974

Comparisons of KTG tenderness scores with objective and subjective evaluations of meat. Jour Animal Sci 22(1): 246, 1963

Tenderness in meat. 1. Comparison between estimations by the Warner Bratzler apparatus and by a taste panel. Ann. Zootech 13: 93-102, 1964

Association of selected SNP with carcass and taste panel assessed meat quality traits in a commercial population of Aberdeen Angus-sired beef cattle. Genetics Selection Evolution 41: 36, 2009

Studies on the evaluation of meat quality. 5. On the adequacy of the N. Wolodkewitsch instrument for the objective measuring of tenderness of veal and poultry meat. Zeitschrift für Tierphysiologie Tierernahrung und Futtermittelkunde 20(1): 1-12, 1965

Genetic parameters for lean meat yield, meat quality, reproduction and feed efficiency traits for Australian pigs: 2. Genetic relationships between production, carcase and meat quality traits. Livestock Production Science 65(3): 249-259, 2000

Studies of determining meat quality V The usefulness of the firmness tester of N wolodkewitsch for the objective measurement of tenderness of veal and chicken meat. Z Tierphysiol Tierernaehr Futtermittelkunde: 1-12, 1965

Factors affecting organoleptic meat traits and objective tenderness measurements in cattle, sheep and pigs, 1970-1977. 1977

Relationships between fed cattle traits and Igenity panel scores. Journal of Animal Science 89(5): 1260-1269, 2011

Relationships between sensory and objective measures of meat tenderness of beef M. longissimus thoracis from bulls and steers. Meat Science 60(3): 211-218, 2002