EurekaMag.com logo
+ Site Statistics
References:
52,725,316
Abstracts:
28,411,598
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
EurekaMag Most Shared ContentMost Shared
EurekaMag PDF Full Text ContentPDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full TextRequest PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on FacebookFollow on Facebook
Follow on TwitterFollow on Twitter
Follow on Google+Follow on Google+
Follow on LinkedInFollow on LinkedIn

+ Translate

The variability of user-based social impact standards for wilderness management


Forest science 38(4): 738-756
The variability of user-based social impact standards for wilderness management
A key element of wilderness management planning is prescribing standards for acceptable levels of impact or change to wilderness conditions based on input from the public. Specifically, to obtain standards for social impacts, wilderness users are surveyed to determine acceptable levels of encounters with other parties. Using a variance components model and generalizability analysis, this study examines four sources of variation in user-based social impact standards: occasion (on-site vs. mailback surveys), wilderness area, encounter context (type and location of encounter), and respondent. Data come from a survey of visitors to four wilderness areas. Results indicate that social impact standards are generalizable across wilderness areas and to a lesser degree across measurement occasions. As expected, social impact standards vary depending on the context of contact. Contrary to normative theory in sociology, standards are also highly variable across respondents. These results suggest that respondents appear to share a high level of sensitivity to encounters, but that the task of assigning a numerical standard may be too abstract or hypothetical to be meaningful. Generalizability coefficients are reported to provide guidelines to future researchers and wilderness managers for obtaining user-based standards.


Accession: 002530845



Related references

Visitors' knowledge of federal wilderness: implications for wilderness user research and management. Proceedings Rocky Mountain Research Station, USDA Forest Service ( RMRS-P-15(Vol. 4)): 122-127, 2000

Variability of user-based evaluative standards for backcountry encounters. Leisure Sciences 24(3/4): 313-324, 2002

User standards for ecological impacts at wilderness campsites. General Technical Report, Intermountain Research Station, USDA Forest Service (INT-212): 166-171, 1986

Defining wilderness quality: the role of standards in wilderness management - a workshop proceedings. Fort Collins, Colorado April 10-11, 1990. U S Forest Service General Technical Report PNW: 1-114 No. 305, 1992

Sustaining the physical and social dimensions of wilderness tourism: the perceptual approach to wilderness management in New Zealand. Journal of Sustainable Tourism 6(1): 26-51, 1998

Developing social standards for wilderness encounters in Mount Rainier National Park: manager-defined versus visitor-defined standards. Proceedings Rocky Mountain Research Station, USDA Forest Service ( RMRS-P-15(Vol. 4)): 134-141, 2000

User evaluation of the DEMentia-specific Digital Interactive Social Chart (DEM-DISC). A pilot study among informal carers on its impact, user friendliness and, usefulness. Aging & Mental Health 14(4): 461-470, 2010

Donations as an alternative to wilderness user fees - the case of the Desolation Wilderness. Proceedings Rocky Mountain Research Station, USDA Forest Service ( RMRS-P-15(Vol. 4)): 142-147, 2000

The role of involvement in identifying users preferences for social standards in the Cohutta Wilderness. General technical report SE US Department of Agriculture Forest Service Southeastern Forest Experiment Station: (67) 173-183, 1991

Wilderness user preferences--Eastern and Western areas Management aspects, United States. Proceedings of Wilderness Management Symposium: a conference of eastern wilderness managers and visitors for improving wilderness management in the East: The University of Tennessee Knoxville November 13-15-1980: 144, 1981