+ Translate

The variability of user-based social impact standards for wilderness management

, : The variability of user-based social impact standards for wilderness management. Forest science 38(4): 738-756

A key element of wilderness management planning is prescribing standards for acceptable levels of impact or change to wilderness conditions based on input from the public. Specifically, to obtain standards for social impacts, wilderness users are surveyed to determine acceptable levels of encounters with other parties. Using a variance components model and generalizability analysis, this study examines four sources of variation in user-based social impact standards: occasion (on-site vs. mailback surveys), wilderness area, encounter context (type and location of encounter), and respondent. Data come from a survey of visitors to four wilderness areas. Results indicate that social impact standards are generalizable across wilderness areas and to a lesser degree across measurement occasions. As expected, social impact standards vary depending on the context of contact. Contrary to normative theory in sociology, standards are also highly variable across respondents. These results suggest that respondents appear to share a high level of sensitivity to encounters, but that the task of assigning a numerical standard may be too abstract or hypothetical to be meaningful. Generalizability coefficients are reported to provide guidelines to future researchers and wilderness managers for obtaining user-based standards.

(PDF 0-2 workdays service)

Accession: 002530845

Submit PDF Full Text: Here

Submit PDF Full Text

No spam - Every submission is manually reviewed

Due to poor quality, we do not accept files from Researchgate

Submitted PDF Full Texts will always be free for everyone
(We only charge for PDFs that we need to acquire)

Select a PDF file:

Related references

Hockett, K.S.; Hall, T.E., 2000: Visitors' knowledge of federal wilderness: implications for wilderness user research and management. Earlier research using interviews of backcountry hikers in Shenandoah National Park in Virginia, USA raised concerns that visitors may not know much about federal wilderness. This lack of knowledge has implications for research on wilderness exper...

Cole, D.N.; Stewart, W.P., 2002: Variability of user-based evaluative standards for backcountry encounters. Backcountry visitors are often surveyed regarding their personal evaluative standards (or norms) for acceptable levels of encounters with other groups. In this study, backpackers at Grand Canyon National Park in Arizona, USA were asked about the a...

Shelby, B.; Harris, R., 1986: User standards for ecological impacts at wilderness campsites. Traditionally, evaluative standards for campsites have been based on expert judgments, although several studies show that judgments of managers often differ from those of users. Other studies have focused on user evaluations of campsite impacts, b...

Shelby, B.; Stankey, G.; Shindler, B., 1992: Defining wilderness quality: the role of standards in wilderness management - a workshop proceedings. Fort Collins, Colorado April 10-11, 1990. U S Forest Service General Technical Report PNW: 1-114 No. 305

Higham, J., 1998: Sustaining the physical and social dimensions of wilderness tourism: the perceptual approach to wilderness management in New Zealand. The dynamics of the tourism industry are well illustrated by the case of New Zealand's tourism development over the last decade. With tourists demonstrating a preference for more independent and dispersed patterns of travel, including an incr...

Lah, K.J., 2000: Developing social standards for wilderness encounters in Mount Rainier National Park: manager-defined versus visitor-defined standards. This research compared the differences found between manager-defined and visitor-defined social standards for wilderness encounters in Mount Rainier National Park, in Washington, USA. Social standards in recreation areas of public land are defined...

van der Roest, Hëtte.G.; Meiland, F.J.M.; Jonker, C.; Dröes, R-Marie., 2010: User evaluation of the DEMentia-specific Digital Interactive Social Chart (DEM-DISC). A pilot study among informal carers on its impact, user friendliness and, usefulness. The need for information about the disease and coping with the consequences, as well as on available care and welfare services, is frequently unmet in people with dementia and their carers. To provide carers of community-dwelling people with demen...

Martin, S.R., 2000: Donations as an alternative to wilderness user fees - the case of the Desolation Wilderness. Day-use visitors to the Desolation Wilderness, located west of Lake Tahoe in California, USA, were asked about making voluntary donations at the trailhead. Of the 111 visitors who used one of the four trailheads at which voluntary donations were r...

Young, J.; Williams, D.; Roggenbuck, J., 1991: The role of involvement in identifying users preferences for social standards in the Cohutta Wilderness. General technical report SE US Department of Agriculture Forest Service Southeastern Forest Experiment Station: (67) 173-183

Roggenbuck, Jw, 1981: Wilderness user preferences--Eastern and Western areas Management aspects, United States. Proceedings of Wilderness Management Symposium: a conference of eastern wilderness managers and visitors for improving wilderness management in the East: The University of Tennessee Knoxville November 13-15-1980: 144