+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
EurekaMag Most Shared ContentMost Shared
EurekaMag PDF Full Text ContentPDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full TextRequest PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on FacebookFollow on Facebook
Follow on TwitterFollow on Twitter
Follow on Google+Follow on Google+
Follow on LinkedInFollow on LinkedIn

+ Translate

Denitrification in a restored riparian forest wetland

Journal of Environmental Quality 24(5): 808-815

Denitrification in a restored riparian forest wetland

Groundwater nitrate moving from upland areas toward streams can be removed by denitrification in mature riparian forests, but denitrification in restored riparian forests has not been quantified. We determined denitrification rates in a restored riparian wetland below a liquid manure application site. A riparian forest buffer consisting of hardwoods along the stream and pines above the hardwoods was established according to USDA specifications. Denitrification was measured monthly using the acetylene inhibition technique on intact soil cores for 2 mo before manure application began and for 24 mo after manure application. Groundwater movement of NO-3-N and total Kjeldahl N were estimated biweekly. Average annual denitrification rate was 68 kg N-2O-N ha-1 yr-1. Denitrification was significantly higher in a grassed area than in either of the forested areas. Denitrification did not differ significantly between the hardwood and pine areas. Denitrification was greater than a conservative estimate of groundwater input of total N. Denitrification rates were higher in April and May 1992 and 1993, after manure application to the upland began, compared with April and May 1991, before manure application began. These results indicate that a riparian wetland, which has not undergone hydrologic modifications, can have denitrification rates comparable to mature riparian forests. Higher denitrification rates in an adjacent grassed wetland and lack of differences in denitrification in hardwood and pine zones indicates that the high denitrification rates were due to factors other than the reforestation itself. Compared with groundwater inputs of N, denitrification was an important sink for N moving from the upland management system.

(PDF same-day service: $19.90)

Accession: 002590451

DOI: 10.2134/jeq1995.00472425002400050003x

Related references

A quantitative approach for measuring N and P concentration changes in surface runoff from a restored riparian forest wetland. Wetlands. 14(2): 73-81, 1994

Denitrification hot spot and hot moments in a restored riparian system. IAHS-AISH Publication 342: 433-436, 2011

Nutrient transport in a restored riparian wetland. Journal of Environmental Quality 32(2): 711-726, 2003

Localization of denitrification activity in macropores of a riparian wetland. Soil biology and biochemistry 36(4): 563-569, 2004

Preferential flow caused by past disturbance in a restored riparian wetland. Preferential flow: water movement and chemical transport in the environment Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium, Ala Moana Hotel, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA, January 3-5, 2001: 61-64, 2001

Methods to assess the water quality impact of a restored riparian wetland. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 48(3): 223-230, 1993

Denitrification potential, root biomass, and organic matter in degraded and restored urban riparian zones. Restoration Ecology: 1, 113-120, 2010

Sources of dissolved organic carbon for denitrification in a riparian wetland. Abstracts with Programs - Geological Society of America 30(7): 85, 1998

Spatiotemporal distributions of bacterivorous nematodes and soil resources in a restored riparian wetland. Ecology (Washington D C) 79(8): 2721-2734, 1998

Surface runoff samplers for nutrient assimilation measurements in a restored riparian wetland. Land reclamation: advances in research and technology: 135-143, 1992