EurekaMag.com logo
+ Site Statistics
References:
53,869,633
Abstracts:
29,686,251
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
EurekaMag Most Shared ContentMost Shared
EurekaMag PDF Full Text ContentPDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full TextRequest PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on FacebookFollow on Facebook
Follow on TwitterFollow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedInFollow on LinkedIn

+ Translate

Effect of row spacings and N levels on chickpea genotypes under late sown conditions



Effect of row spacings and N levels on chickpea genotypes under late sown conditions



Indian Journal of Pulses Research 7(1): 80-81



In a field experiment in 1989-91 at Hisar, Haryana with chickpeas GL 769, KPG 59, PBG 1 or H82-2, seed yields were not affected by row spacing (20 or 30 cm) or N fertilizer rate (20 or 40 kg/ha).

(PDF emailed within 1 workday: $29.90)

Accession: 002604192

Download citation: RISBibTeXText



Related references

Effect of dates of sowing and row spacings on chick pea genotypes under late sown conditions. Advances in Plant Sciences 15(2): 517-523, December, 2002

Effect of cytozyme on the growth and yield of chickpea genotypes under late sown conditions. Agricultural Science Digest 5(2): 106-107, 1985

Performance of tall chickpea genotypes under normal and late-sown conditions. International Chickpea Newsletter (8): 8-9, 1983

Field screening of chickpea genotypes against gram pod borer under late sown conditions. Journal of Entomological Research (New Delhi) 23(2): 133-140, June, 1999

Response of chickpea (Cicer arietinum) genotypes to irrigation and fertilizers under late-sown conditions. Indian Journal of Agronomy 43(1): 95-101, 1998

Response of chickpea genotypes to population densities and Atonik spray under late sown conditions. Indian Journal of Pulses Research 1(2): 128-133, 1988

Performance of chickpea (Cicer arietinum) genotypes at varying population densities under late sown conditions. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 69(10): 693-695, 1999

Field screening of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) genotypes against gram pod borer (Heliothis armigera Hub.) under late sown conditions. Journal of Entomological Research 23(2): 133-140, 1999

Effect of plant population and row spacing on light interception and grain yield of chickpea under late sown conditions. International Journal of Tropical Agriculture 4(3): 245-250, 1986

Location of sources of resistance amongst chickpea genotypes against gram pod borer under normal sown conditions by using new parameters. Journal of Entomological Research (New Delhi) 23(1): 19-26, March, 1999

Wheat/chickpea intercropping under late-sown conditions. Journal of Agricultural Science 121(2): 141-144, 1993

Selection methods in chickpea under late-sown conditions. International Chickpea Newsletter ( 29): 7-8, 1993

Relative preference of different chickpea genotypes by Helicoverpa armigera Hubner and estimation of yield losses under late sown condition. Indian Journal of Pulses Research 16(2): 144-146, 2003

Varietal improvement of chickpea for rainfed and late sown conditions. 2006

Effect of weed management techniques and phosphorus levels on weed infestation and seed yield of late sown chickpea. Indian Journal of Pulses Research 14(2): 119-121, 2001