EurekaMag.com logo
+ Site Statistics
References:
53,869,633
Abstracts:
29,686,251
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
EurekaMag Most Shared ContentMost Shared
EurekaMag PDF Full Text ContentPDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full TextRequest PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on FacebookFollow on Facebook
Follow on TwitterFollow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedInFollow on LinkedIn

+ Translate

Effect of subsurface drain spacing and nitrogen level on yield and growth of upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) and pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum) in saline soil



Effect of subsurface drain spacing and nitrogen level on yield and growth of upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) and pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum) in saline soil



Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 65(1): 27-33



A field study conducted from 1985-87 in India studied the effect of 3 drain spacings (25, 50 and 75 m) and 3 levels of nitrogen (60, 80 and 100 kg N/ha) for upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) and 3 levels of N (80, 100 and 120 kg N/ha) for pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum) on soil salinity, growth and crop yield on a sandy-loam saline soil (Calciorthid).

(PDF emailed within 1 workday: $29.90)

Accession: 002604988

Download citation: RISBibTeXText



Related references

Effect of subsurface drain spacing and nitrogen level on yield and growth of upland cotton and pearl millet in saline soil. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 65(1): 27-33, 1995

Effect of hybrid, spacing and nitrogen levels on growth and yield of upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Agricultural Science Digest Karnal 16(1): 49-51, 1996

Effect of subsurface drain spacing on growth and yield behaviour of cotton on a saline soil. Journal of the Indian Society of Soil Science 39(4): 757-761, 1991

Effect of level of nitrogen on its uptake and yield of pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum) in north coastal Andhra Pradesh. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 63(1): 41-42, 1993

Effect of tillage practices and levels of nitrogen on growth and yield of pearl millet. (Pennisetum glaucum L.). Progressive Agriculture 1(1): 42-46, 2001

Soil organic carbon and nutrient uptake vis-a-vis growth and yield of pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum) as influenced by water and nitrogen in Typic Haplustept soil. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 79(5): 359-363, 2009

Effect of planting pattern and spacing on the growth and yield of upland cotton gossypium hirsutum. Journal of Research Punjab Agricultural University 22(2): 220-228, 1985

Rooting pattern nutrient uptake and yield of pearl millet pennisetum typhoideum and cotton gossypium herbaceum as affected by nutrient availability from the surface and subsurface soil layers. Field Crops Research 10(1): 77-86, 1985

Rooting pattern, nutrient uptake and yield of pearl millet (Pennisetum typhoideum Pers.) and cotton (Gossypium herbaceum) as affected by nutrient availability from the surface and subsurface soil layers. Field Crops Research 10(1): 77-86, 1985

Effect of soil moisture conservation and weed control practices on growth and yield of rainfed pearl-millet (Pennisetum glaucum). Annals of Plant Protection Sciences 1(2): 121-125, 1993

Effect of different water regimes and nitrogen application on growth, yield, water use and nitrogen uptake by pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum). Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 80(3): 213-216, 2010

The effect of number of cuttings, seeding rate and row spacing on the yield and leaf area index of pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum L.R. Br.). Israel J. agric. Res, 15: 4, 179-86. bibl. 7, 1965

Nitrogen, sulphur and thiourea nutrition of pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br.). II. Effect on yield and yield components. Annals of Arid Zone 37(1): 59-67, 1998

Effect of pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum) based intercropping system on yield and economics of pearl millet on shallow soils under rainfed conditions. International Journal of Agricultural Sciences 3(2): 192-193, 2007

Effect of nutrient-management practices on growth and yield of pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum). Indian Journal of Agronomy 52(1): 64-66, 2007