+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
EurekaMag Most Shared ContentMost Shared
EurekaMag PDF Full Text ContentPDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full TextRequest PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on FacebookFollow on Facebook
Follow on TwitterFollow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedInFollow on LinkedIn

+ Translate

Implications of the variance effective population size on the genetic conservation of monoecious species

Implications of the variance effective population size on the genetic conservation of monoecious species

Tag. Theoretical and Applied Genetics. Theoretische und Angewandte Genetik 89(7-8): 936-942

The concept of variance effective population size [Ne(v)] and other expressions are reviewed and described for specific sampling steps in germplasm collection and regeneration of monoecious species. Special attention is given to procedures for computing the variance of the number of contributed gametes [V(k)] to the next generation. Drift, as it occurs between generations, was considered to contain a component due to the sampling of parents and a subsequent component due to the sampling of gametes. This demonstrates that drift, caused by reduction of seed viability, damages the genetic integrity of accessions stored in germplasm banks. The study shows how mating designs, such as plant-to-plant or chain crossings with additional female gametic control, can partially alleviate this problem. Optimal procedures for increasing Ne(v) when collecting germplasm in the field are also discussed. The effect of different female and male gametic control strategies on Ne(v) is considered under several situations. Practical examples illustrating the use of V(k) and Ne(v) expressions are given.

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 002635555

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 24178107

DOI: 10.1007/BF00224521

Related references

Variance effective population size for two-stage sampling of monoecious species. Crop Science 37(1): 14-26, 1997

Variance effective population size under mixed self and random mating with applications to genetic conservation of species. Crop science 39(5): 1282-1294, 1999

Sample size and variance effective population size for genetic resources conservation. Plant Genetic Resources Newsletter ( 119 Suppl.): 15-25, 1999

The history of effective population size and genetic diversity in the Yellowstone grizzly (Ursus arctos): implications for conservation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 100(7): 4334-4339, 2003

Estimates of effective population size and inbreeding in South African indigenous chicken populations: implications for the conservation of unique genetic resources. Tropical Animal Health and Production 48(5): 943-950, 2017

Population genetic consequences of small population size: implications for plant conservation. Annual review of ecology and systematics4(24): 217-242, 1993

Effective population size and genetic conservation criteria for bull trout. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 21(4): 756-764, 2001

Effective population size of steelhead trout: influence of variance in reproductive success, hatchery programs, and genetic compensation between life-history forms. Molecular Ecology 16(5): 953-966, 2007

Genetic consequences of polygyny and social structure in an Indian fruit bat, Cynopterus sphinx. II. Variance in male mating success and effective population size. Evolution 55(6): 24-32, 2001

Genetics, demography, effective population size and conservation of species. Wissenschaftliche Zeitschrift der Humboldt Universitat zu Berlin Reihe Mathematik/Naturwissenschaftliche 39(4): 384-388, 1990

Genetics demographics effective population size and species conservation. Wissenschaftliche Zeitschrift der Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin Reihe Mathematik-Naturwissenschaften 39(4): 384-388, 1990

Definition and estimation of effective population size in the conservation of endangered species. Unknown, 2002

Effective size and F-statistics of subdivided populations. I. Monoecious species with partial selfing. Genetics 146(4): 1453-1463, 1997

Conservation genetics of pacific salmon ii. effective population size and the rate of loss of genetic variability. Journal of Heredity 81(4): 267-276, 1990

Supportive breeding and effective population size differences between inbreeding and variance effective numbers. Conservation Biology 8.3: 888-890, 1994