+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
EurekaMag Most Shared ContentMost Shared
EurekaMag PDF Full Text ContentPDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full TextRequest PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on FacebookFollow on Facebook
Follow on TwitterFollow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedInFollow on LinkedIn

+ Translate

A comparison of dynamic programming and A* in optimal forest stand management

A comparison of dynamic programming and A* in optimal forest stand management

Forest science 42(4): 498-503

A model that adds a forward value estimator to traditional forward recursion dynamic programming (DP) is developed. State classes are used to store continuous values for stand basal area and stem density. A simple forward heuristic that estimates future value from deviations within a node is used in the model in combination with accumulated value to determine path choice (A*). A loblolly pine growth and yield model with both pulpwood and sawtimber product outputs is used in the model. The model is tested on combinations of initial planting density, site index, and interest rates to compare A* to DP in optimization of thinning age, thinning intensity, and rotation age. Results from tests using single-year stage intervals show increases of 0.0% to 1.2% in net present value for A* compared to DP. An A* approach increases computer program size very little but requires additional time for parameter searching. However, A* always generated solutions at least as high as DP.

(PDF emailed within 1 workday: $29.90)

Accession: 002736166

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

Related references

A neuro-dynamic programming approach to the optimal stand management problem. General Technical Report Pacific Northwest Research Station, USDA Forest Service (PNW-GTR-656): 265-272, 2005

Integrating the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process with dynamic programming approach for determining the optimal forest management decisions. Ecological Modelling 194(1/3): 296-305, 2006

A study on the controlling of optimal stand density for Chinese fir big diameter wood by using continuous dynamic programming. Journal of Fujian College of Forestry 20(2): 144-146, 2000

How to formulate and solve 'optimal stand density over time' problems for even-aged stands using dynamic programming. General Technical Report, North Central Forest Experiment Station, USDA Forest Service (NC-56): ii + 17, 1980

Utilization of linear programming in the determination of an optimal strategy for improving a forest stand. IPEF Instituto de Pesquisas e Estudos Florestais (31): 47-53, 1985

Derivation of optimal stand density over time a discrete stage continuous state dynamic programming solution. Forest Science 26(2): 217-227, 1980

Optimal forest investment decisions through dynamic programming. Bull. Yale Sch. For, 72, 70, 1968

Determination of the optimum cutting policy for the forest stand by means of dynamic programming. Acta for. fenn, 102: 23, 1969

Optimal forest harvest decisions: a stochastic dynamic programming approach. Agricultural Systems 42(1/2): 73-84, 1993

Dynamic programming: a tool for financial analysis of stand management regimes. Information Report Pacific and Yukon Region, Canadian Forest Service ( BC-X-343): iv + 15 pp., 1993

Optimal management of unconfined aquifer using differential dynamic programming. Shuili Xuebao = Journal of Hydraulic Engineering: 7, Pages 28-33. 1993., 1993

Using stochastic dynamic programming to determine optimal fire management for Banksia ornata. Journal of Applied Ecology 38(3): 585-592, 2001

Optimal beef production management strategies for Hawaii: a dynamic programming approach. Dissertation Abstracts International, A 42(12): p.5198, 1982

Possibilities of prediction of stand development to site optimal structures by computer (example of mountain forest in forest management unit Jezersko). Gorski gozd: zbornik referatov XIX gozdarski studijski dnevi, Logarska dolina, Slovenija, 26-27 marec 1998: 465-478, 1998

Forest management planning by linear programming timber harvest scheduling of a korean pine stand. Journal of Korean Forestry Society 80(4): 427-435, 1991