+ Translate

Bee keeping and honey production 1580-1660

, : Bee keeping and honey production 1580-1660. Bee keeping and honey production 1580-1660: 52 pp.

Part 1 describes beekeeping methods in Britain in 1580-1660, covering the following aspects: beekeepers, location of hives, the hives used, swarming, protection, obtaining the honey (the September cull and midsummer driving), processing the honey, production levels and use, wax, pests, winter. Part 2 comprises 77 notes, by M. Buckle, commenting on aspects in Part 1. Part 3 contains 3 short texts by writers of this period - Henry Best, Gervase Markham and William Lawson.

(PDF 0-2 workdays service)

Accession: 002763254

Submit PDF Full Text: Here

Submit PDF Full Text

No spam - Every submission is manually reviewed

Due to poor quality, we do not accept files from Researchgate

Submitted PDF Full Texts will always be free for everyone
(We only charge for PDFs that we need to acquire)

Select a PDF file:

Related references

Elhendy, A.M.A., 1999: An economic study of honey production efficiency at Saudi Arabia: a case of honey keeping at Asseer. Honey production sector had developed from the local production, which increased from only 5 tonnes in 1986 to 144 tonnes in 1996. However during the same period, the consumption increased from 80 to 3500 tonnes. The decrease in self-sufficiency r...

Corby, H.D.L., 1943: Bee-keeping and honey production in Kontagora Emirate. An account of the bee-keeping industry among the natives of Kontagora Emirate (western Nigeria) with particular reference to the methods of processing the honey.

Schubring, W., 1940: Bee keeping, and honey and beeswax production throughout the world. THE U.S.S.R., U.S.A., Germany, France, Mexico, and Turkey each have more than a million bee colonies, Czechoslovakia, Jugoslavia, Greece, Italy, and Romania have from 500, 000 to 1 million, Austria, Bulgaria, Portugal, Hungary, and Canada have abo...

Conrad, J., 1983: Keeping bees in northeastern Mexico Honey production and trade. American bee journal 123(1): 36-37

Izquierdo, J.A.; Menendez, R., 1980: Effect of mulching on the growth, production, quality and keeping of melon cv. Honey Dew. Four soil mulching treatments (clear and black plastic, corn straw and control) were applied over winter melon cv. Honey Dew plants after transplanting. Vigour, yield, earliness and quality were increased. Soil temperatures at 15 cm under mulching...

Maung Maung Nyein, 1984: Study on traditional method of keeping Indian honey bees in Burma and keeping with modern method. Apis cerana is kept in hives made from hollow logs, bamboo stems, or clay pots sunk in the ground; discarded wooden boxes are also used. In the Chin States, hill tribes make a wood-topped 'cave' in sloping ground and put in a piece of co...

Williams, I.H.; Carreck, N.; Little, D.J., 1993: Nectar sources for honey bees and the movement of honey bee colonies for crop pollination and honey production in England. This article presents information obtained through a survey of beekeepers (1984-86), and the records of some beekeepers' associations, on the movement of honey bee colonies [Apis mellifera] to crops for honey production or pollination, and on...

Harbo, J.R., 1993: Worker-bee crowding affects brood production, honey production, and longevity of honey bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae). This study measured the effects of hive volume on the productivity and growth of colonies of honey bees, Apis mellifera L., in Baton Rouge, LA. In a winter experiment, populations of 5,000, 10,000, and 15,000 bees were installed in hives to produc...

Duff, S.; Furgala, B., 1986: Pollen trapping honey bee colonies in Minnesota. II. Effect on foraging activity, honey production, honey moisture content, and nitrogen content of adult workers. American bee journal 126(11): 755-758

Duff, S.R.; Furgala, B., 1986: Pollen trapping honey bee colonies in Minnesota. Part II: Effect on foraging activity, honey production, honey moisture content, and nitrogen content of adult workers. Further results with 4 groups of colonies (full-time trapping (A), part-time (B), 'no time' (C), no trap (D)) are reported [see abstract of Part I in this issue of Apicultural Abstracts]. A B and C had significantly fewer returning forag...