EurekaMag.com logo
+ Site Statistics
References:
52,725,316
Abstracts:
28,411,598
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
EurekaMag Most Shared ContentMost Shared
EurekaMag PDF Full Text ContentPDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full TextRequest PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on FacebookFollow on Facebook
Follow on TwitterFollow on Twitter
Follow on Google+Follow on Google+
Follow on LinkedInFollow on LinkedIn

+ Translate

Behaviour and productivity of sows and piglets in a family system and in farrowing crates


Applied Animal Behaviour Science 50(2): 135-145
Behaviour and productivity of sows and piglets in a family system and in farrowing crates
The behaviour and productivity of 48 sows and their litters were compared in a family system (FS) and in farrowing crates (FC) for 4 weeks post partum during day-time. FS sows were housed in groups of four in enclosures with straw-bedded, voluntary-accessed farrowing pens and an outer communal area. Occupancy of farrowing pens by FS sows fell from 92.5% on day 1 to 35.5% by day 28. FS sows spent less time lying inactive (47.0 vs. 59.5%; P lt 0.01), showed more substrate-directed behaviour (11.3 vs. 2.2%; P lt 0.01) and tended to show less pen-directed behaviour than FC sows. Overall, there tended to be more suckling in FS with longer (P lt 0.05) but less frequent bouts (P lt 0.05). FS sows responded to play-back of piglet distress vocalisations by standing up more frequently (76.1 vs. 34.9%; P lt 0.01). FS piglets spent more time in the heated creeps (65.8 vs. 28.2%; P lt 0.05), lying on their sides (50.7 vs. 31.5%; P lt 0.05) and playing (0.9 vs. 0.1%; P lt 0.05). Pen-directed behaviour was greater (0.8 vs. 0.2%; P lt 0.05) and chewing the sow tended to be greater in FC piglets. There were no significant differences in piglet mortality for the two systems. Piglet growth rates were higher for FS in week 2 (P lt 0.05). Maternal behaviour was improved in FS which may have resulted in productivity benefits.

Accession: 002763530

DOI: 10.1016/0168-1591(96)01075-1

Download PDF Full Text: Behaviour and productivity of sows and piglets in a family system and in farrowing crates



Related references

Housing sows in farrowing crates with straw racks Behaviour of sows and piglets as well as performance and piglet growth. Zuechtungskunde 75(3): 226-235, Mai-Juni, 2003

Changes in nursing and suckling behaviour of sows and their piglets in farrowing crates. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 31(3-4): 271-275, 1991

The behaviour and welfare of sows and piglets in farrowing crates or lactation pens. Animal 1-12, 2016

Productivity and behaviour of sows in level vs. sloped farrowing pens and crates. Journal of Animal Science 68(1): 82-87, 1990

The effects of providing sawdust to pre-parturient sows in farrowing crates on sow behaviour, the duration of parturition and the occurrence of intra-partum stillborn piglets. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 36(4): 301-315, 1993

Evaluation of two alternative housing systems for farrowing and nursing sows in comparison to two forms of farrowing crates by ethological and developmental parameters of the piglets. Landbauforschung Volkenrode 45(1): 12-29, 1995

Peripartal behaviour and teat lesions of sows in farrowing crates and in a loose-housing system. Animal Welfare 16(2, Sp. Iss. SI): 273-276, 2007

Group housing with electronically controlled crates for lactating sows Effect on farrowing, suckling and activity behavior of sows and piglets. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 145(1-2): 37-43, 2013

Changes in nursing and suckling behavior of sows and their piglets in farrowing crates. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 31(3-4): 271-276, 1991

Ingestion of iron in sows feces by piglets reared in farrowing crates with slotted floors. British Journal of Nutrition 47(1): 113-118, 1982