EurekaMag.com logo
+ Site Statistics
References:
53,517,315
Abstracts:
29,339,501
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
EurekaMag Most Shared ContentMost Shared
EurekaMag PDF Full Text ContentPDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full TextRequest PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on FacebookFollow on Facebook
Follow on TwitterFollow on Twitter
Follow on Google+Follow on Google+
Follow on LinkedInFollow on LinkedIn

+ Translate

Developmental stability and fitness: a review



Developmental stability and fitness: a review



American Naturalist 149(5): 916-932



Developmental stability reflects the ability of individuals to undergo stable development of their phenotype under a range of environmental conditions. Developmental instability is measured in terms of fluctuating asymmetry or phenodeviance. A negative relationship between developmental instability and fitness has figured as a prominent untested assumption in the literature. A review of available information from the literature on the relationship between developmental instability and various fitness components such as growth, fecundity, and longevity suggests that there indeed is a general negative relationship. Symmetrical individuals do generally have faster growth, higher fecundity, and better survival than do more asymmetrical individuals. These differences appear partially to arise from lower competitive ability and higher risks of predation and parasitism of asymmetrical individuals compared with more symmetrical conspecifics. The relationship between developmental stability and fitness may be either direct or indirect.

Accession: 002800489

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 18811255

DOI: 10.1086/286030

Download PDF Full Text: Developmental stability and fitness: a review



Related references

Coadaptation, developmental stability, and fitness of insecticide resistance genotypes in the Australian sheep blowfly, Lucilia cuprina: a review. Acta Zoologica Fennica. 30 June; 191: 107-110, 1992

Developmental stability is related to fitness. The American Naturalist 153(5): 6-60, 1999

Developmental stability and fitness: the evidence is not quite so clear. American Naturalist 152(5): 762-766, 2008

Intraspecific hybridization, developmental stability and fitness in Drosophila mercatorum. Evolutionary Ecology Research ; 4(4): 603-621, 2002

Developmental stability-fitness relationships in animals Some theoretical considerations. Polak, Michal , Reprint Author Developmental instability: Causes and consequences: 187-195, 2003

Relationships between developmental stability and fitness: Application for conservation biology. Conservation Biology 9(1): 18-24, 1995

The effect of lead on fitness components and developmental stability in Drosophila subobscura. Acta Biologica Hungarica 59(1): 47-56, 2008

The impact of genetic parental distance on developmental stability and fitness in Drosophila buzzatii. Genetica 134(2): 223-233, 2007

Effects of crossing distance on offspring fitness and developmental stability in Dalechampia scandens (Euphorbiaceae). American Journal of Botany 92(5): 842-851, 2005

Developmental stability, fitness, and trait size in laboratory hybrids between European subspecies of the house mouse. Evolution 51(4): 1284-1295, 1997

Physical activity and fitness in children with developmental coordination disorder: a systematic review. Research in Developmental Disabilities 32(3): 894-910, 2011

Developmental stability heterozygosity and fitness in two introduced fire ants solenopsis invicta and solenopsis richteri and their hybrid. Heredity 64(1): 93-104, 1990

Asymmetry, developmental stability, and evolution (book review). Evolution 52(6): 72-6, 1998

Developmental phenology and the timing of determination of shoot bud fates Ways in which the developmental program modulates fitness in clonal plants. de Kroon, H , van Groenendael, J The ecology and evolution of clonal plants 31-53, 1997

Developmental origins of cognitive vulnerabilities to depression: review of processes contributing to stability and change across time. Journal of Clinical Psychology 65(12): 1327-1338, 2010