+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
EurekaMag Most Shared ContentMost Shared
EurekaMag PDF Full Text ContentPDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full TextRequest PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on FacebookFollow on Facebook
Follow on TwitterFollow on Twitter
Follow on Google+Follow on Google+
Follow on LinkedInFollow on LinkedIn

+ Translate

Diagnosing nutrient deficiencies in soybean, using M-DRIS and critical nutrient level procedures

Agronomy Journal 87(5): 859-865

Diagnosing nutrient deficiencies in soybean, using M-DRIS and critical nutrient level procedures

Plant nutrient deficiencies may be diagnosed with DRIS (diagnosis and recommendation integrated system) or critical nutrient level (CNL) procedures. While extensive efforts have been made to improve diagnoses by DRIS and M-DRIS, little has been done to refine CNL diagnoses for soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr). In this study, we compare diagnoses made by M-DRIS with those from CNL and modify these procedures to improve their diagnostic accuracy. Two databases of R2 (full bloom) soybean leaf nutrient concentrations from 828 field observations of known K, Mn, Zn, or P deficiencies or sufficiencies were used for comparing the procedures. We optimized critical nutrient levels (modified CNL) using the same cases from a database that was used earlier to improve M-DRIS. Using this optimization database, the M-DRIS and modified-CNL procedures had ltoreq 13 misdiagnoses each of K nutrient status compared to 81 by unmodified CNL. M-DRIS was more accurate than the two CNL procedures in diagnosing P deficiencies from cases in the optimized and independent data sets. Unmodified CNL produced 18 misdiagnoses for Zn status from cases in the independent data set, versus gt 27 for M-DRIS or modified CNL. Generally, M-DRIS was the same or more accurate than CNL methods in diagnosing nutrient status. We recommend CNL concentrations for R2 stage soybean of 3.1 g P kg-1, 15.1 g K kg-1, 17 mg Mn kg-1, and 21 mg Zn kg-1. For M-DRIS, we recommend critical index values of zero for K and Mn, 18 for P, and - 19 for Zn.

(PDF 0-2 workdays service: $29.90)

Accession: 002800658

Related references

Comparison of critical nutrient concentrations with dris for assessing nutrient deficiencies of potatoes on irrigated chernozemic soils. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 69(2): 601-610, 1989

Comparison of two dris methods for diagnosing nutrient deficiencies. Journal of Fertilizer Issues 4(4): 151-158, 1987

Changes in the critical level and the nutritional balance in soybean plants in relation to various nutrient deficiencies. Lucrari stiintifice Seria A Agronomieub 1977) 17(17): 52-55, 1977

Developing nutrient norms using DRIS for diagnosing N, P and K status in soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.). Mysore Journal of Agricultural Sciences 1999; 32(3): 195-200, 1998

Relationship among the DRIS Index, DRIS Nutrient Balance Index, leaf nutrient content and coffee yield in Venezuela. Bioagro 14(3): 153-159, 2002

Utilization of dris for diagnosis of nutrient deficiencies in winter wheat. Agronomy Journal 79(3): 472-476, 1987

Comparison of DRIS and M-DRIS for diagnosing P and K deficiencies in soybeans. Better Crops with Plant Food 72(3): 20-21, 1988

Changes in the critical level and in the nutritional balance of soyabean in relation to various nutrient deficiencies. Lucrari Stiintifice, Institutul Agronomic "Nicolae Balcescu", A 17: 52-55, 1977

Variation in the critical level and nutrient equilibrium in tomatoes, in relation to mineral deficiencies. Comptes Rendus, 4e Colloque International sur le Controle de l' Alimentation des Plantes Cultivees Gent, September 1976, Vol II: ; 247-254, 1976

DRIS diagnoses of nutrient sufficiencies and deficiencies in dallisgrass grown on relatively fertile and infertile soils in a greenhouse. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 21(13-16): 1367-1379, 1990